2025年5月9日 星期五
居伊·德波的电影与悖论
The Films and Paradox of Guy Debord
摘要

本文聚焦居伊·德波的电影作品及他宣称其作品不适用于“电影作品”的悖论。德波认为电影是异化的交流形式, 其内在逻辑是反对电影成为一种样貌的景观社会而强化景观的统治。他通过对电影总体性的否定, 呼应情境主义者解放日常生活的目标。本文分析了德波如何通过对媒介自身的否定与反动的核心战术———“异轨”, 借用现有形式, 从内部瓦解, 从而创造了批判的张力和可能性。在当今背景下, 随着人们从被动走向主动参与影像生产, 夺回观看的主体性成为可能。作者认为战争影像是一种重新夺取影像、赋予其新的意义的方式, 通过这些影像, 对景观发起视觉反抗, 进而构建属于自己的世界影像。

Abstract

This article focuses on Guy Debord’s films and his paradoxical claim that his works do not qualify as “films”. Debord viewed cinema as an alienated form. of communication, whose inherent logic opposes the transformation of cinema into a spectacle, a process that would reinforce the dominance of the society of the spectacle. By rejecting the totality of cinema’s conventional narrative and form, Debord aligns with the situationists’ goal of liberating everyday life. This article analyzes Debord’s core tactic of Détournement as a form. of negation and opposition to the medium itself, repurposing existing forms and subverting them from within to generate critical tension and open up new possibilities. In the contemporary context, as individuals shift from passive consumers to active participants in image production, reclaiming the agency of viewing becomes possible. The author argues that war imagery is a means of reclaiming visual representation and assigning it new meaning. Through these visuals, a form. of visual resistance is mounted against the spectacle, thereby constructing a personal image of the world.  

DOI10.48014/aas.20241015005
文章类型研究性论文
收稿日期2024-10-15
接收日期2024-11-15
出版日期2024-12-28
关键词居伊·德波, 景观社会, 异轨, 电影批判, 主体性
KeywordsGuy Debord, society of the spectacle, detournement, cinematic critique, subjectivity
作者丛峰
AuthorCONG Feng
所在单位独立研究者, 北京 100000
CompanyIndependent Researcher, Beijing 100000
浏览量147
下载量143
参考文献[1] Debord, Guy. Howlings in Favour of de Sade [DB/OL].
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8o3ue5-lA8,2016-08-18.
[2] Debord, Guy. We Spin Around the Night Consumed by the Fire [DB]. 1978.
[3] 阿甘本, 吉奥乔. 区别与重复: 居伊·德波的电影[A/OL]. 布莱恩·福尔摩斯, 译//张一兵. 社会批判理论纪事(第7辑)[C]. 南京: 南京大学出版社, 2014.
https://ptext.nju.edu.cn/1f/60/c13367a532320/page.htm,2021-06-24.
[4] Debord, Guy. For and Against Cinema [J/OL]. Translated by I. Thompson.
https://libcom.org/article/and-against-cinema,2022-11-25.
[5] 德波, 居伊. 景观社会[M]. 王昭风, 译. 南京: 南京大学出版社, 2006: 3.
[6] Debord, Guy. On the Passage of a Few Persons Through a Rather Brief Unity of Time [DB/OL].
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s0sfC20aACA,2013-05-26.
[7] Isou, Isidore. Venom and Eternity[DB]. 1951.
[8] 瓦纳格姆, 鲁尔. 日常生活的革命: 论几代青年的日常生活艺术[M]. 张新木, 戴秋霞, 译. 南京: 南京大学出版社, 2008: 132.
[9] Debord, Guy. Critique of Separation[DB/OL].
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0aow-eo3MRE,2021-12-04.
引用本文丛峰. 居伊·德波的电影与悖论[J]. 艺术学研究进展, 2024, 1(1): 58-62.
CitationCONG Feng. The films and paradox of Guy Debord[J]. Advances in Art Science, 2024, 1(1): 58-62.