城市化与生态系统服务研究热点与发展态势 ———基于CiteSpace的可视化分析

张骥闽; ZHANG Jimin; 张远通; ZHANG Yuantong

doi:10.48014/ais.20251203004

城市化与生态系统服务研究热点与发展态势 ———基于CiteSpace的可视化分析

Research Hotspots and Development Trends in Urbanization and Ecosystem Services:A Visual Analysis Based on CiteSpace

交叉科学学报 2025年第2卷第4期页码[149-159] 下载全文[6.7MB]

摘要

本研究运用CiteSpace文献计量方法, 对2005—2025年中国知网收录的240篇城市化与生态系统服务研究文献进行可视化分析。研究发现: 该领域研究呈现明显的三阶段演进特征, 从缓慢起步到快速发展, 最终进入深化拓展阶段。研究力量分布呈现“核心-边缘”结构, 合作网络密度较低 (0. 0025) , 但形成了以核心学者为主导的研究团体。关键词分析显示, 该领域形成了以城市化、生态系统服务和土地利用为核心的多层次知识体系, 聚类轮廓值达0. 9598, 表明研究主题具有高度内聚性。本研究系统揭示了该领域的发展脉络与知识结构, 为后续研究提供了重要参考, 对推动城市化与生态保护的协调发展具有理论与实践意义。

Abstract

This study employs the CiteSpace bibliometric method to conduct a visual analysis of 240 research articles on urbanization and ecosystem services indexed in the CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure) database from 2005 to 2025. The findings reveal a distinct three-stage evolutionary pattern, moving from slow initiation to rapid development and ultimately entering a stage of deepening and expansion. The distribution of research actors presents a “core-periphery” structure, with low overall collaboration density (0. 0025) , although clusters led by core scholars have formed. Keyword analysis shows the development of a multi-level knowledge structure centered on urbanization, ecosystem services, and land use, with a cluster silhouette value of 0. 9598, indicating strong thematic cohesion. This study systematically reveals the developmental trajectory and knowledge structure of this field, providing an important reference for future research. It also holds theoretical and practical significance for promoting the coordinated development of urbanization and ecological conservation.

DOI

10.48014/ais.20251203004

文章类型

综述

收稿日期

2025-12-03

接收日期

2025-12-04

出版日期

2025-12-28

关键词

城市化, 生态系统服务, CiteSpace, 可视化分析

Keywords

Urbanization, ecosystem services, CiteSpace, visual analysis

作者

张骥闽^*, 张远通

Author

ZHANG Jimin^*, ZHANG Yuantong

所在单位

中国科学院大学, 北京 101499

Company

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 101499, China

浏览量

下载量

参考文献

[1] YANG Y, ZHENG H, KONG L, et al. Mapping ecosystem services bundles to detect high-and low-value ecosystem services areas for land use management[J/OL]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 225: 11-17.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.242.
[2] COSTANZA R, DE GROOT R, BRAAT L, et al. Twenty years of ecosystem services: how far have we come and how far do we still need to go?[J/OL]. Ecosystem Services, 2017, 28: 1-16.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.008.
[3] LI R, XU Q, YU J, et al. Multiscale assessment of the spatiotemporal coupling relationship between urbanization and ecosystem service value along an urban-rural gradient: a case study of the Yangtze River delta urban agglomeration, china[J/OL]. Ecological Indicators, 2024, 160: 111864.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111864.
[4] XIE G, ZHANG C, ZHEN L, et al. Dynamic changes in the value of China’s ecosystem services[J/OL]. Ecosystem Services, 2017, 26: 146-154.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.010.
[5] LEIBENATH M. Ecosystem services and neoliberal governmentality - german style[J/OL]. Land Use Policy, 2017, 64: 307-316.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.02.037.
[6] JIANG W. Ecosystem services research in China: a critical review[J/OL]. Ecosystem Services, 2017, 26: 10-16.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.05.012.
[7] LI G, FANG C, WANG S. Exploring spatiotemporal changes in ecosystem-service values and hotspots in China[J/OL]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 545- 546: 609-620.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.067.
[8] 周德良, 杨明霞, 苏靖雅, 等. 流域生态系统服务价值评估研究进展[J]. 中国沙漠, 2024, 44(4): 149-164.
https://doi.org/10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2024.00005
[9] 戴尔阜, 王晓莉, 朱建佳, 等. 生态系统服务权衡:方法、模型与研究框架[J]. 地理研究, 2016, 35(6): 1005-1016.
https://doi.org/10.11821/dlyj201606001
[10] 戴尔阜, 王晓莉, 朱建佳, 等. 生态系统服务权衡/协同研究进展与趋势展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 2015, 30(11): 1250-1259.
https://doi.org/10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2015.11.1250
[11] FENG X, FU B, PIAO S, et al. Revegetation in China’s loess plateau is approaching sustainable water resource limits[J/OL]. Nature Climate Change, 2016, 6(11): 1019-1022.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3092.
[12] CHICAGO L Q, ECHEVERRÍA C, PIZARRO C J. Ecosystem services trade-offs in landscapes: trends, areas of greatest impact, and temporal evolution of the scientific field[J/OL]. Landscape Ecology, 2022, 37(9): 2225-2239.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-022-01488-8.

引用本文

张骥闽, 张远通. 城市化与生态系统服务研究热点与发展态势———基于CiteSpace的可视化分析[J]. 交叉科学学报, 2025, 2(4): 149-159.

Citation

ZHANG Jimin, ZHANG Yuantong. Research hotspots and development trends in urbanization and ecosystem services: a visual analysis based on CiteSpace[J]. Acta Interdisciplinary Science, 2025, 2(4): 149- 159.