游客感知视角下中国赴泰旅游安全事件特征及致因研究

王玉淑; WANG Yushu; 范莉娜; FAN Lina; 戈大专; GE Dazhuan

doi:10.48014/cgsr.20250408001

游客感知视角下中国赴泰旅游安全事件特征及致因研究

Research on the Characteristics and Causes of Safety Incidents in Chinese Tourism to Thailand from the Perspective of Tourist Perception

中国地理科学评论 2025年第3卷第3期页码[24-39] 下载全文[2.1MB]

摘要

分析并揭示游客感知视角下中国游客赴泰国旅游安全事件特征及其引致因素研究对旅游健康发展具有重要意义。论文以2016年1月至2019年12月和2023年1月至2025年1月中国赴泰游客旅游游记为数据源, 运用社会网络分析法和非线性典型相关分析法定量描述了游客感知视角下中国赴泰游客安全事件的网络结构特征和关联特征。研究发现: 中国赴泰旅游安全事件数量分布差距明显, 事故灾难安全事件与社会安全事件数量占比大; 游客旅游安全事件区域分布呈现集聚性特征, 清迈、普吉岛、曼谷是游客安全事件重灾区, 不同类型的安全事故分布上具有显著的差异性, 安全事故的类型分布与事件发生城市有显著相关性, 各旅游目的地之间的旅游安全事件同质性与异质性并存。据此基于“4M”要素理论 (人、机、环、管) , 指出人的不安全行为、设备设施问题、环境因素以及管理缺陷共同作用于安全事件的分布特征。研究结果为理解出境旅游安全事件特征及防控策略提供了理论支持与实践依据。

Abstract

Analyzing and revealing the characteristics and triggering factors of safety incidents involving Chinese tourists traveling to Thailand from the perspective of tourist perception is of great significance for the healthy development of tourism. The paper uses the travelogues of Chinese tourists visiting Thailand from January 2016 to December 2019 and from January 2023 to January 2025 as data sources, and uses social network analysis and nonlinear canonical correlation analysis to quantitatively describe the network structure and correlation characteristics of safety incidents of Chinese tourists visiting Thailand from the perspective of tourists' perception. Research has found that there is a significant gap in the distribution of safety incidents during Chinese tourism to Thailand, the proportion of accidents, disasters, and social safety incidents is relatively high; The regional distribution of tourist safety incidents shows clustering characteristics, with Chiang Mai, Phuket, and Bangkok being the hardest hit areas for tourist safety incidents. There are significant differences in the distribution of different types of safety accidents, and the types of safety accidents are significantly correlated with the cities where the incidents occurred. The homogeneity and heterogeneity of tourist safety incidents among various tourist destinations coexist. Based on the "4M" element theory (human, machine, environment, and management) , it is pointed out that unsafe human behavior, equipment and facility problems, environmental factors, and management deficiencies jointly affect the distribution characteristics of safety events. The research results provide theoretical support and practical basis for understanding the characteristics of outbound tourism safety incidents and prevention and control strategies.

DOI

10.48014/cgsr.20250408001

文章类型

研究性论文

收稿日期

2025-04-08

接收日期

2025-06-23

出版日期

2025-09-28

关键词

游客感知, 旅游安全事件, 致因分析, 赴泰旅游

Keywords

Tourist perception, tourism safety incidents, causal analysis, traveling to Thailand

作者

王玉淑¹, 范莉娜¹, 戈大专^2,*

Author

WANG Yushu¹, FAN Lina¹, GE Dazhuan^2,*

所在单位

1. 贵州民族大学旅游与航空服务学院, 贵阳 550025
2. 南京师范大学地理科学学院, 南京 210023

Company

1. School of Tourism and Aviation Services, Guizhou Minzu University, Guiyang 550025, China
2. School of Geographical Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China

浏览量

下载量

基金项目

国家自然科学基金项目(项目编号:42271205)。

参考文献

[1] 杨婷婷, 阮文奇, 张舒宁. 旅游需求对跨境危机事件信息扩散的空间响应与影响因素[J]. 旅游学刊, 2022, 37(08): 119-132.
https://doi.org/10.19765/j.cnki.1002-5006.2021.00.019.
[2] 王晶晶, 郑向敏. 内地居民对台湾地区的旅游安全感知研究———基于内地十个代表性城市的调查[J]. 乐山师范学院学报, 2015, 30(05): 76-82+120.
https://doi.org/10.16069/j.cnki.51-1610/g4.2015.05.016.
[3] Fuchs G, Reichel A. An exploratory inquiry into destination risk perceptions and risk reduction strategies of first time vs. repeat visitors to a highly volatile destination[J]. Tourism management, 2011, 32(2): 266-276.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2010.01.012.
[4] 邹永广, 郑向敏. 游客安全感的影响要素、形成机理及提升策略研究[J]. 人文地理, 2012, 27(03): 103-108+77.
https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2012.03.004.
[5] 邹永广, 郑向敏. 旅游目的地游客安全感形成机理实证研究[J]. 旅游学刊, 2014, 29(03): 84-90.
https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2014.03.009.
[6] Alkier R, Okicˇic' J, Milojica V. Factors of tourists’ perceived safety in the post covid period: the case of Opatija riviera[C]//26th International congress Tourism and hospitality industry 2022 Trends and challenges Congress proceedings. 2022: 1-16.
https://doi.org//10.20867/thi.26.13
[7] Gui* * D, * *feng W. Research on Regional Differences of Perception of Safety of Tourists—Taking Potential Tourists as an Example[C]//E3S Web of Conferences. EDP Sciences, 2021, 251: 03010.
https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125103010
[8] 杨钦钦, 谢朝武. 冲突情景下旅游安全感知的作用机制: 好客度的前因影响与旅游经验的调节效应[J]. 南开管理评论, 2019, 22(3): 11.
[9] 成汝霞, 黄安民. 夜间旅游游客安全感的影响因素及生成路径研究[J]. 福建农林大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021, 24(05): 81-88.
https://doi.org/10.13322/j.cnki.fjsk.2021.05.010.
[10] Preko A, Gyepi-Garbrah T F. Understanding sense of safety and trustworthiness of tourism information among migrant visitors[J]. International Hospitality Review, 2023, 37(1): 143-160.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IHR-04-2021-0029.
[11] 吴高杨, 谢朝武, 张江驰, 等. 顺“势”随“心”: 风险信息对游客安全行为的影响机制研究[J]. 旅游科学, 2023, 37(06): 141-162.
https://doi.org/10.16323/j.cnki.lykx.20230412.001.
[12] Ye H, Chen S, Law R, et al. Perceived Risk of Chinese Outbound Tourists in the Risky World[J]. Journal of China Tourism Research, 2023, 20(1): 70-89.
https://doi.org/10.1080/19388160.2023.2178574
[13] 朱尧, 邹永广. 中国游客赴欧洲旅游安全感知事件空间特征研究[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2019, 38(6): 74-79.
https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-2363.2019.06.014.
[14] 全国人民代表大会. 中华人民共和国突发事件应对法[L]. 2007-08-10.
[15] 谢朝武, 黄锐. 目的地旅游安全事件集群: 概念框架与测度体系研究[J]. 旅游学刊, 2023, 38(05): 42-57.
https://doi.org/10.19765/j.cnki.1002-5006.2022.00.024.
[16] 朱尧, 邹永广. 中国游客赴欧洲旅游安全感知事件空间特征研究[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2019, 38(06): 74-79.
[17] Ateş A, Sunar H. The Mediating Role of Local People's Attitudes and Behaviours on the Impact of Destination Safety Climate on Risk Perception: A Study on Foreign Tourists in ̇Istanbul and Antalya[J]. Sosyoekonomi, 2024, 32(62): 247-272.
https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2024.04.13
[18] Assaker G, Hallak R. Moderating effects of tourists’ novelty-seeking tendencies on destination image, visitor satisfaction, and short-and long-term revisit intentions[J]. Journal of Travel Research, 2013, 52(5): 600-613.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287513478497.
[19] Zhang H, Cho T, Wang H. The impact of a terminal high altitude area defense incident on tourism risk perception and attitude change of Chinese tourists traveling to South Korea[J]. Sustainability, 2019, 12(1): 7.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010007.
[20] 程云, 殷杰. 中国旅游安全事件分布与引致因素[J]. 经济地理, 2020, 40(11): 215-224.
https://doi.org/10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2020.11.024.
[21] 邹永广, 朱尧. 突发旅游公共卫生事故合作治理的网络特征研究———以10·8海螺沟食物中毒为例[J]. 华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018(04): 26-38.
https://doi.org/10.16067/j.cnki.35-1049/c.2018.04.003.
[22] 邹永广, 杨勇, 李媛, 等. 出境旅游安全救援中华侨华人作用研究———以赴泰旅游为例[J]. 旅游学刊, 2023, 38(05): 73-86.
https://doi.org/10.19765/j.cnki.1002-5006.2022.00.035.
[23] 谢朝武, 张俊, 陈岩英. 中国出境旅游安全风险的区域分布研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(01): 155-160.
https://doi.org/10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2018.01.026.
[24] 谢朝武, 赖菲菲, 黄锐, 等. 中国出境旅游安全事件集群: 空间分异及组态致因[J]. 地理研究, 2023, 42(05): 1177-1199.
https://doi.org/10.11821/dlyj020220866
[25] 黄锐, 谢朝武. 中国赴东盟地区旅游安全事故风险因子的组态影响探测———基于HEVP框架的模糊集定性比较分析[J]. 经济地理, 2021, 41(07): 202-212.
https://doi.org/10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2021.07.022.
[26] Parasakul L. An Importance-performance Analysis of Chinese Tourists’ Perceived Risk in Thailand[J]. Suranaree Journal of Social Science, 2023, 17(1): 19.
https://doi.org/10.55766/RCXC8198
[27] Tasci A D A, Boylu Y. Cultural comparison of tourists' safety perception in relation to trip satisfaction[J]. International Journal of Tourism Research, 2010, 12(2): 179-192.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.745.
[28] 杨钦钦, 谢朝武. 冲突情景下旅游安全感知的作用机制: 好客度的前因影响与旅游经验的调节效应[J]. 南开管理评论, 2019, 22(03): 148-158.
[29] 黄锐, 谢朝武. 中国出境旅游安全事故时空分布格局及形成机制[J]. 人文地理, 2019, 34(06): 120-128.
[30] 章坤, 谢朝武, 章屹祯. 中国赴东盟旅游安全事件集群强度: 时空分异、动态演变及驱动因素[J]. 人文地理, 2023, 38(06): 148-159.
https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2023.06.016.
[31] Xie C, Zhang K, Zhang J, et al. Driving factors and spatio- temporal evolution of tourist accident clusters in Chinese outbound tourism[J]. Current Issues in Tourism, 2025: 1-19.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2025.2456080
[32] 李月调, 谢朝武. 赴泰中国游客安全事故时空分布研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2016, 26(06): 169-174.
https://doi.org/10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2016.06.030.
[33] 朱尧, 邹永广, 李强红, 等. 旅游安全事件与其空间分布结构特征———以中国公民赴马来西亚旅游安全感知事件为例[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2022, 41(4): 137- 142, 156.
https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-2363.2022.04.023.
[34] Lower M, Magott J, Skorupski J. A system-theoretic accident model and process with human factors analysis and classification system taxonomy[J]. Safety science, 2018, 110: 393-410.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.04.015.
[35] Xie C, Zhang J, Chen Y, et al. Measuring hotel employee perceived job risk: dimensions and scale development[J]. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 2020, 32(2): 730-748.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-01-2019-0022
[36] Xie C, Zhang J, Morrison A M. Developing a scale to measure tourist perceived safety[J]. Journal of Travel Research, 2021, 60(6): 1232-1251.
https://doi.org/10.1177/004728752110494610
[37] 邹永广, 林炜铃, 郑向敏. “驴友”旅游安全事故成因机理研究———基于扎根理论范式的质性分析[J]. 旅游科学, 2014, 28(03): 76-86.
https://doi.org/10.16323/j.cnki.lykx.2014.03.001.
[38] 方永芳. 旅游安全评价研究综述[J]. 服务科学和管理, 2021, 10(4): 62-70.
https://doi.org/10.12677/SSEM.2021.104011
[39] 刘逸, 李源, 纪捷韩. 地理学视角下旅游安全事故成因研究———以我国居民赴泰旅游为例[J]. 世界地理研究, 2022, 31(2): 236-248.
https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2022.02.2020488.
[40] 张隋. 基于携程网游客评论的宿迁市三台山风景区旅游目的地形象感知研究[J]. 可持续发展, 2024, 14(2): 329-338.
https://doi.org/10.12677/sd.2024.142042
[41] 张文彤. SPSS 统计分析高级教程[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2004: 213-233.
[42] 李月调, 谢朝武, 王静. 时空因素对我国赴泰旅游安全事件的影响[J]. 世界地理研究, 2017, 26(05): 128-135.
https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2017.04.013.
[43] 朱尧, 邹永广, 李强红, 等. 网络关系视角下中国公民出境旅游安全感知事件时空分布特征———以“一带一路”沿线国家为例[J]. 世界地理研究, 2020, 29(06): 1304-1311.
https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2020.06.2019183
[44] 李月调, 谢朝武, 王静. 时空因素对我国赴泰旅游安全事件的影响[J]. 世界地理研究, 2017, 26(5): 128-135.
https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2017.04.013.
[45] 殷杰, 郑向敏. 高聚集游客群安全的影响因素与实现路径———基于扎根理论的探索[J]. 旅游学刊, 2018, 33(07): 133-144.
[46] 谢朝武. 旅游应急管理[M]. 北京: 中国旅游出版社, 2013: 154.
[47] 邹雅真, 谢朝武. 大陆游客赴台旅游安全事件结果特征及其引致因素研究[J]. 旅游学刊, 2016, 31(08): 81-89.
https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2016.08.013.
[48] Chen C F, Tsai D C. How destination image and evaluative factors affect behavioral intentions?[J]. Tourism management, 2007, 28(4): 1115-1122.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2006.07.007.
[49] Leatherman S P, Leatherman S B, Rangel-Buitrago N. Integrated strategies for management and mitigation of beach accidents[J]. Ocean and Coastal Management, 2024, 253(000): 23.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2024.107173.
[50] 李朝霞, 吴军. 基于网络游记的台儿庄古城元素性符号研究[J]. 地理科学研究, 2018, 7(4): 313-320.
https://doi.org/10.12677/gser.2018.74036
[51] 曾文菁, 周恺, 熊益群. 2005—2020年城市研究中机器学习方法应用进展与综述[J]. 中国地理科学评论, 2023, 1(1): 16-30.

引用本文

王玉淑, 范莉娜, 戈大专. 游客感知视角下中国赴泰旅游安全事件特征及致因研究[J]. 中国地理科学评论, 2025, 3(3): 24-39.

Citation

WANG Yushu, FAN Lina, GE Dazhuan. Research on the characteristics and causes of safety incidents in Chinese tourism to Thailand from the perspective of tourist perception[J]. Chinese Geography Sciences Review, 2025, 3(3): 24-39.