Methodological Evolution,Limitation Diagnosis,and Innovation Pathways of Case Study Research on Rural Sustainable Development:A Case Study of Zaozhuang
Rural sustainable development research urgently requires in-depth analysis of local practices, and case studies hold irreplaceable value in revealing mechanisms, explaining regional differences, and evaluating policy effects. However, existing research commonly suffers from arbitrary theoretical frameworks, non-standardized case designs, weak evidence chains, and insufficient cross-case comparability. Through a systematic literature review, this paper traces the evolutionary trends in case study research—from descriptive explanation to mechanism identification, from single-method to mixed-methods approaches, and from static analysis to multi-scale dynamic analysis. It proposes innovative directions such as enhancing crosscase comparability, embedding causal inference designs, integrating multi-source data including remote sensing and social surveys, and developing standardized structured case databases. Taking the typical context of rural transformation in Zaozhuang—a resource-based region—as an example, this study explores case selection, evidence organization, and analytical pathways adapted to local heterogeneous needs, aiming to promote an empirical research paradigm for rural sustainable development that is interpretable, comparable, and policy-transferable.