| 摘要 | 自然资本是生态服务系统的重要组成部分, 是人类生存发展的必要条件, 是经济-社会-环境持续健康发展的重要支撑。本文基于Web of Science (WOS) 数据库的核心合集数据库, 应用CiteSpace和VOSviewer软件对自然资本2001—2022年学科发展态势和热点研究进行可视化分析。结果表明: (1) 自然资本的主要发文国家分别是美国、中国、英国、澳大利亚和加拿大, 美国位居首位中国紧随其后, 中美两国在自然资本研究领域远领先于世界其他国家; (2) 在自然资本文章发表机构中, 中国科学院、澳大利亚国立大学、牛津大学、斯坦福大学、昆士兰大学、北京师范大学位列前六, 中国机构在自然资本研究机构文章发表中位居前列, 中科院发文量领先于其他发文机构; (3) 近20年间自然资本研究文章发表量一直呈现指数型增长, 在2013—2022间呈现爆发式增长; (4) 研究热点涵盖了资源管理、可持续发展、气候变化、生态服务、环境保护和生物多样性等, 说明自然资本领域的研究需要多学科领域科学技术支撑, 该领域研究的深入推动了其他学科领域发展。 |
| Abstract | Natural capital is an important part of the ecological service systems, a necessary condition for human survival and development, and an important support for the sustainable and healthy development of the three dimensions of society, economy and environment. Based on the core ensemble database of Web of science (WOS) database, this paper uses CiteSpace and VOSviewer software to visualise and analyze the subject development trend and hot research of natural capital from 2001 to 2022. The results show that: 1. The major publishing countries in natural capital are the United States, China, the United Kingdom, Australia and Canada, with the United States in first place followed by China, and China and the United States are far ahead of the rest of the world in natural capital research. 2. The Chinese Academy of Sciences, the Australian National University, the University of Oxford, Stanford University, the University of Queensland and Beijing Normal University are the top six publishers in natural capital research institutions, with the Chinese Academy of Sciences leading the way in terms of the number of articles published. 3. In the past 20 years, the number of articles published on natural capital research has been growing exponentially, with an explosive growth during 2013-2022. 4. Research hotspots cover resource management, sustainable development, climate change, ecological services, environmental protection and biodiversity, etc. , indicating that natural capital needs scientific and technological support from multi-disciplinary fields, and in-depth research in this field also promotes the development of other disciplines. |
| DOI | 10.48014/csdr.20230405001 |
| 文章类型 | 研究性论文 |
| 收稿日期 | 2023-04-05 |
| 接收日期 | 2023-05-11 |
| 出版日期 | 2023-06-28 |
| 关键词 | 自然资本, 知识图谱, CiteSpace, VOSviewer, 研究热点 |
| Keywords | Natural capital, knowledge graph, CiteSpace, VOSviewer, research hotspot |
| 作者 | 梁金水, 李源, 尹增强* |
| Author | LIANG Jinshui, LI Yuan, YIN Zengqiang* |
| 所在单位 | 大连海洋大学海洋科技与环境学院, 大连 116023 |
| Company | College of Marine Technology and Environment, Dalian Ocean University, Dalian 116023, China |
| 浏览量 | 297 |
| 下载量 | 138 |
| 基金项目 | 国家重点研发计划项目(项目号:2019YFD0901302)和大连市科技创新基金项目(项目号:2021JJ11CG001)资助 |
| 参考文献 | [1] 谢高地. 生态资产评价: 存量、质量与价值[J]. 环境保护, 2017, 45(11): 18-22. [2] Daily G C. Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems(1997)[M]. Yale University Press, 2013. [3] Assessment M E. Ecosystems and Human Well-being [M]. Island Press United States of America, 2005. [4] Hrabanski M. Private sector involvement in the millennium ecosystem assessment: using a un platform to promote market-based instruments for ecosystem services[J]. Crossref, 2017, 27(6): 605-618. https://doi.org/10.1002/EET.1780 [5] 余韵, 杨建锋. 浅析地质多样性对生态系统服务的作用与贡献[J]. 中国国土资源经济, 2021, 34(4): 23-28. [6] 杨武, 陶俊杰, 陆巧玲. 基于生态系统服务视角的人类福祉评估技术方法体系[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(2): 730-736. [7] Burkhard B, Kroll F, Nedkov S, et al. Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2012, 21: 17-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019 [8] Daily G, Polasky S, Goldstein J, et al. Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2009, 7(1): 21-28. https://doi.org/10.1890/080025 [9] 欧阳志云, 朱春全, 杨广斌, 等. 生态系统生产总值核算: 概念、核算方法与案例研究[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(21): 6747-6761. [10] 董天, 张路, 肖燚, 等. 鄂尔多斯市生态资产和生态系统生产总值评估[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(9): 3062-3074. [11] Zanka B, Bagstadb-K J, Voigtc B. 模拟城市蔓延对自然资本存量和生态服务功能流的影响: 美国华盛顿州普吉特海湾的案例研究[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2016(3): 126. [12] 欧阳志云, 赵同谦, 王效科, 等. 水生态服务功能分析及其间接价值评价[J]. 生态学报, 2004(10): 2091-2099. [13] 陈仲新, 张新时. 中国生态系统效益的价值[J]. 科学通报, 2000(1): 17-22, 113. [14] 于德永, 潘耀忠, 刘鑫, 等. 湖州市生态资产遥感测量及其在社会经济中的应用[J]. 植物生态学报, 2006(3): 404-413. [15] 王宗明, 国志兴, 宋开山, 等. 2000—2005年三江平原土地利用/覆被变化对植被净初级生产力的影响研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2009, 24(1): 136-146. [16] 潘耀忠, 史培军, 朱文泉, 等. 中国陆地生态系统生态资产遥感定量测量[J]. 中国科学(D辑: 地球科学), 2004(4): 375-384. [17] Costanza R, D'arge R, De groot R, et al. The Value of the World's Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital[J]. Ecological Economics, 1998, 25(1): 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00020-2 [18] Azad M A S, Ancev T. Assessing the dynamics of natural capital on farms: A soil natural capital indicator[J]. Ecological Economics, 2020, 168: 106500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106500 [19] 李真, 潘竟虎, 胡艳兴. 甘肃省生态资产价值和生态-经济协调度时空变化格局[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(1): 64-75. [20] 张丙宣, 杨婷, 倪玮苗. 绿水青山转化为金山银山的机制———以浙江省遂昌县的GEP核算为例[J]. 社会治理, 2021, 58(02): 25-30. [21] 李跃林, 宁天竹, 徐华林, 等. 深圳湾福田保护区红树林生态系统服务功能价值评估[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2011, 31(2): 41-49. [22] 江波, 陈媛媛, 肖洋, 等. 白洋淀湿地生态系统最终服务价值评估[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(8): 2497-2505. [23] 吴玲玲, 陆健健, 童春富, 等. 长江口湿地生态系统服务功能价值的评估[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2003(5): 411-416. [24] 徐伟平, 康文星, 何介南. 洞庭湖区生态系统服务功能价值分析[J]. 草业学报, 2016, 25(1): 217-229. [25] Tallis H, Ricketts T H, Daily G C, et al. Natural Capital: Theory and Practice of Mapping Ecosystem Services[M]. Oxford University Press, 2011. [26] Barbier E B. The protective value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services in a wealth accounting framework[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2016, 64(1): 37-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-015-9931-z [27] 方恺, Reinout Heijungs. 自然资本核算的生态足迹三维模型研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2012, 31(12): 1700-1707. [28] Ekins P, Simon S, Deutsch L, et al. A framework for the practical application of the concepts of critical natural capital and strong sustainability[J]. Ecological Economics, 2003, 44(2): 165-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00272-0 [29] 王新庆. “绿水青山就是金山银山”的基本形态生态资产及价值形式分析[J]. 林业经济, 2019, 41(2): 22-25. [30] Andrea, Rey-martí, Domingo, et al. A bibliometric analysis of social entrepreneurship[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2016, 69(5): 1651-1655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.033 [31] Pitkow J E, Pirolli P L, Mackinlay J D, et al. Method and apparatus for clustering a collection of linked documents using co-citation analysis[P]. US, 2000. [32] Thelwall M. Bibliometrics to webometrics[J]. Journal of Information Science, 2008, 34(4): 605-621. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551507087238 [33] Cobo M J, López-herrera A, Herrera-viedma E, et al. Science mapping software tools: review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 2014, 62(7): 1382-1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525 [34] Klavans R, Boyack K W. Identifying a better measure of relatedness for mapping science[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 2014, 57(2): 251-263. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20274 [35] White H D, Mccain K W. Visualizing a discipline: an author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972- 1995[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1998, 49(4): 327-355. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(19980401)49:43.0.CO;2-4 [36] Chen C. Citespace II: detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2006, 57(3): 359-377. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20317 [37] 陈悦, 陈超美, 刘则渊, 等. CiteSpace知识图谱的方法论功能[J]. 科学学研究, 2015, 33(2): 242-253. [38] Chaomei Chen, Zhigang Hu, Shengbo Liu, et al. Emerging trends in regenerative medicine: A scientometric analysis in CiteSpace[J]. Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, 2012, 12(5): 593-608. https://doi.org/10.1517/14712598.2012.674507 [39] Eck N, Waltman L. VOSviewer: a computer program for bibliometric mapping[R]: Erim Report Series Research in Management, 2009. [40] Sood Sandeep-Kumar, Kumar Navin, Saini Munish. Scientometric analysis of literature on distributed vehicular networks : VOSViewer visualization techniques[Z]. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. [41] Costanza R, D'arge R, Groot R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997, 387(15): 253-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00020-2 [42] Coleman J. Social capital in the creation of human capital[ J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1988, 94: S95-S120. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943 [43] Costanza R, Daly H. Natural capital and sustainable development[ J]. Conservation Biology, 1992, 6(1): 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.610037.x [44] Costanza R, Groot R, Sutton P Changes in the global value of ecosystem services[J]. Global Environmental Change-human and Policy Dimensions, 2014, 26: 152-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002 [45] Sachs J D, Warner A M. The curse of natural resources[J]. European Economic Review, 2001, 45(4-6): 827-838. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00125-8 [46] Gylfason T. Natural resources, education, and economic development[J]. European Economic Review, 2001, 45(4-6): 847-859. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00127-1 [47] Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, et al. A safe operating space for humanity[J]. Nature, 2009, 461(7263): 472-475. https://doi.org/10.1038/461472a [48] Groot R, Wilson M, Boumans R. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services[J]. Ecological Economics, 2002, 41(3): 393-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7 [49] Bebbington A. Capitals and capabilities: a framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty[J]. World Development, 1999, 27(12): 2021-2044. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00104-7 [50] Ploeg F. Natural resources: curse or blessing?[J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 2011, 49(2): 366-420. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.49.2.366 |
| 引用本文 | 梁金水, 李源, 尹增强. 自然资本研究的文献计量学与可视化分析[J]. 中国可持续发展评论, 2023, 2(2): 37-48. |
| Citation | LIANG Jinshui, LI Yuan, YIN Zengqiang. Bibliometric and visual analysis of natural capital studies[J]. Chinese Sustainable Development Review, 2023, 2(2): 37-48. |