2024年4月27日 星期六
我国“租购同权”政策实施影响分析
Analysis on the Effect of “EqualRight to Rent and Purchase” Policy Implementation in China
摘要

住房以及相关基本公共服务的保障问题是关系到人民安居乐业的基本问题。如果居民的租房权力与住房权力存在不对等的情况, 将势必影响租房群体的相关利益。本文分析“租购同权”政策实施对于我国房屋房地产销售市场和租赁市场的影响。以广州市2017年7月17日实施的“租购同权”政策为分界点, 利用了双重差分法 (DID) 对广州二手房市场以及租房市场进行了分析。结论表明, “租购同权”政策的实施, 对于广州二手房市场的房价并没显著影响, 但是可以使得学区房房价的增长率下降, 起到一定的抑制作用; 同时该政策对房屋租赁市场影响不显著。本文认为, 未来应当贯彻落实细化“租购同权”政策, 力图给予购房者和租房者相同享受公共产品服务的权利, 是促进社会公平和谐发展的手段。以“学区房”为例, 可以减缓学区房相关地区房价的持续增长, 有利于房地产市场的健康发展。

Abstract

The protection of housing and related basic public services is a fundamental issue that concerns people’s security of tenure. If there is a mismatch between the right to rent and the right to housing, it will inevitably affect the relevant interests of the rental group. This paper analyzes the impact of the implementation of the “equal rights to rent and purchase” policy on the real estate sales market and rental market in China. Taking the policy of “equal rights to rent and purchase” implemented in Guangzhou on July 17, 2017 as the cut-off point, this paper analyzes the second-hand housing market and the rental market in Guangzhou by using the method of differences-in-differences (DID) . The conclusion shows that the implementation of “equal rights to rent and purchase“ policy has no significant impact on the housing price of secondhand housing market in Guangzhou, but it can a dampening effect by reducing the growth rate of housing price of school district, and play a certain inhibitory role. At the same time, the policy has no significant impact on the housing rental market. This paper argues that the policy of “equal rights for rent and purchase” should be implemented refined in the future, in an attempt to give the same rights to public goods and services to the home buyers and renters, as a means of promoting the fair and harmonious development of society. Taking “school district housing” as an example, it can slow down the continuous growth of housing prices in areas related to school district housing, which is conducive to the healthy development of the real estate market.  

DOI10.48014/jce.20221114001
文章类型研究性论文
收稿日期2022-11-14
接收日期2023-03-12
出版日期2023-09-28
关键词租购同权, 学区房, 双重差分法(DID)
KeywordsRental and purchase parity, school district housing, difference in difference method (DID)
作者夏李莹1, 张建波2,*
AuthorXIA Liying1, ZHANG Jianbo2,*
所在单位1. 嘉兴南湖学院, 嘉兴 314001
2. 堪萨斯大学, 劳伦斯 66045
Company1. School of Modern Finance, Jiaxing Nanhu University, Jiaxing 314001, China
2. Department of Economics, University of Kansa, Lawrance 66045, US
浏览量238
下载量116
参考文献[1] Tiebout, Charles M. A pure theory of local expenditures[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1956, 64(5): 416-424.
https://doi.org/10.1086/257839
[2] Rubinfeld D L, Shapiro P, and Roberts J. Tiebout bias and the demand for local public schooling[J]. Review of Economics & Statistics, 1987, 69(3): 426-437.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1925530
[3] Rosen H S, and Fullerton D J. A note on local tax rates, public benefit levels, and property values[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1977, 85(2): 433-440.
https://doi.org/10.1086/260575
[4] Gibbons S, and Machin S. Valuing English primary schools[J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 2003, 53(2): 197-219.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-1190(02)00516-8
[5] Black S E. Do better schools matter? parental valuation of elementary education[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1999, 114(2): 577-599.
https://doi.org/10.1162/003355399556070
[6] Bayer P, Ferreira F, and McMillan R. A unified framework for measuring preferences for schools and neighborhoods[ J]. Journal of Political Economy, 2007, 115(4): 588-638.
https://doi.org/10.1086/522381
[7] Brunner E J, Murdoch J, and Thayer M. School finance reform and housing values[J]. Public Finance and Management, 2002, 2(4): 535-565.
[8] Leech D, and Campos E. Is comprehensive education really free: a case study of the effects of secondary school admissions policies on house prices in one local area[J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 2003, 166(1): 135-154.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-985X.00263
[9] Bogart W T. How much is a neighborhood school worth[J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 2000,(47): 280-305.
https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1999.2142
[10] 毛丰付, 罗刚飞, 潘加顺. 优质教育资源对杭州学区房价格影响研究[J]. 城市与环境研究, 2014(2): 12.
[11] 冯皓, 陆铭. 通过买房而择校: 教育影响房价的经验证据与政策含义[J]. 世界经济, 2010, 33(12): 89-104. DOI: 10. 19985/j. cnki. cassjwe. 2010. 12. 006
[12] 胡婉旸, 郑思齐, 王锐. 学区房的溢价究竟有多大: 利用 “租买不同权”和配对回归的实证估计[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2014, 13(03): 1195-1214. DOI: 10. 13821/j. cnki. ceq. 2014. 03. 017
[13] 于涛, 于静静. “就近入学”下的住宅价格分析———学区房中的教育资本化问题[J]. 中国房地产, 2017(06): 3-13. DOI: 10. 13562/j. china. real. estate. 2017. 06. 002
[14] 李雪松, 陈曦明, 方芳, 等. “二孩政策”与学区房溢价———基于人口政策变化的政策评价分析[J]. 财经研 究, 2017, 43(06): 93-104+145. DOI: 10. 16538/j. cnki. jfe. 2017. 06. 008
[15] 董藩, 董文婷. 学区房价格及其形成机制研究[J]. 社会 科学战线, 2017(1): 9. DOI: CNKI: SUN: SHZX. 0. 2017-01-006
[16] 向为民, 甘蕾. 抑制和稳定房价背景的“租购同权”政策匹配[J]. 改革, 2017(11): 148-157.
[17] 陈友华, 施旖旎. 租购同权: 何以可能?[J]. 吉林大学社会科学学报, 2018, 58(2): 7. DOI: CNKI: SUN: JLDB. 0. 2018-02-012
[18] 王红玲. 我国“租购同权”政策实施难点及对策建议[J]. 金融纵横, 2017(12): 6. DOI: CNKI: SUN: JRZH. 0. 2017-12-014
[19] 周清杰. “租购同权”, 能带来什么改变[J]. 金融经济, 2017(11): 3. DOI: CNKI: SUN: JRJJ. 0. 2017-21-013
[20] 周景彤, 梁婧, 范若滢. “租购同权”重在落实[J]. 中国金融, 2017(17): 54-55.
[21] 黄静, 崔光灿. “租购同权”对提升居民幸福感的影响[J]. 城市问题, 2019(12): 87-96.
https://doi.org/10.13239/j.bjsshkxy.cswt.191211
[22] 张协奎, 刘绍涛. 租购同权、房价租金变动与住房市场 发展———基于广州“租购同权”政策效应的研究[J]. 广西大学学报: 哲学社会科学版, 2020, 42(03): 56-67.
https://doi.org/10.13624/j.cnki.jgupss.2020.03.009
[23] 陈杰, 吴义东. 租购同权过程中住房权与公共服务获取权的可能冲突———为“住”租房还是为“权”租房[J]. 学术月刊, 2019, 51(02): 44-56.
https://doi.org/10.19862/j.cnki.xsyk.2019.02.004
[24] 陈卫华, 林超, 吕萍. “租购同权”对住房市场的影响与政策改进———基于改进“四象限模型”的理论分析[J]. 中国软科学, 2019(11): 86-95.
[25] 王盛, 郭蕾. 租购同权的价值测算———基于上海市学区房的实证分析[J]. 人文杂志, 2019(06): 22-30.
https://doi.org/10.15895/j.cnki.rwzz.2019.06.019
[26] 刘正才, 韩梓. “租购同权”政策对房价的影响研究———以广州市为例[J]. 经济体制改革, 2020(06): 192-196.
引用本文夏李莹, 张建波. 我国“租购同权”政策实施影响分析[J]. 中国经济研究, 2023, 2(3): 31-44.
CitationXIA Liying, ZHANG Jianbo. Analysis on the effect of “Equal Right to Rent and Purchase” policy implementation in China[J]. Journal of Chinese Economy, 2023, 2(3): 31-44.