| 摘要 | 资源型城市作为国家能源供应体系的核心支柱, 为我国经济向环保低碳模式转型提供了坚实的物质基础。为促进“资源-环境-城市”协调发展, 科学评价其绿色转型效率至关重要。本研究以西北地区典型资源型城市嘉峪关市为例, 构建包含经济转型、社会转型、环境转型、绿色转型四个维度共14个指标的评价体系, 采用熵权-TOPSIS综合评价法, 对嘉峪关市2008—2018年间的绿色转型效率进行量化测度, 并进一步引入障碍度诊断模型, 系统识别阻碍其可持续发展的关键制约因素。最后, 针对发现的问题提出绿色转型发展的策略。结果表明: (1) 在经济转型方面, 嘉峪关市转型效能持续提升, 但仍维持在中等水平, 其中GDP贡献度最为突出; 在社会转型方面, 嘉峪关市在2015年以后取得显著进展, 达到较优状态; 在环境转型方面, 嘉峪关市在2012年进入到了优质阶段, 相对贴近度也在逐年上升; 在绿色转型方面, 嘉峪关市自2012年起即保持优质发展态势, 且转型质量指数呈稳定增长趋势, 相对贴近度呈现持续改善态势, 但增速较为平缓, 转型进程仍存在显著的提升空间。 (2) 2008—2018年, 嘉峪关市在经济转型、社会转型、环境转型、绿色转型方面, D+和D-的变化较明显, 绿色转型效率逐步接近最优理想解的发展水平。 (3) 市区空气质量达标天数比例 (X8) 与污水处理厂集中处理率 (X13) 是嘉峪关市绿色转型发展的主要障碍因子。 |
| Abstract | As the core pillar of the national energy supply system, resource-based cities provide a solid material foundation for China' s economic transformation towards an environmentally friendly and low-carbon model. It is crucial to scientifically evaluate the efficiency of green transformation in order to promote the coordinated development of . “resources environment cities”. Taking Jiayuguan City, a typical resourcebased city in northwest China, as an example, this study constructs an urban green transformation efficiency evaluation system from four dimensions of economic transformation, social transformation, environmental transformation, and green transformation, with 14 indicator evaluation factors. The entropy weight TOPSIS model is used to measure the green transformation efficiency of Jiayuguan City from 2008 to 2018, and the obstacle model is combined to evaluate the obstacle factors that affect the green transformation of Jiayuguan City. Finally, propose strategies for the green transformation and development in response to the identified issues. The results show that: (1) In terms of economic transformation, the efficiency of economic transformation in Jiayuguan City has been increasing year by year, but it is basically in the intermediate stage, with the highest GDP weight; In terms of social transformation, Jiayuguan City has made significant progress since 2015, reaching a relatively optimal state; In terms of environmental transformation, Jiayuguan City entered a high-quality stage in 2012, and its relative closeness has been increasing year by year; In terms of green transformation, Jiayuguan City has entered the high-quality stage from the initial stage since 2012, and its relative closeness has been increasing year by year. The relative closeness has shown a continuous improvement trend, but the growth rate is relatively slow, and there is still significant room for improvement in the transformation process (2) From 2008 to 2018, in terms of economic transformation, social transformation, environmental transformation, and green transformation, there were significant changes in D+and D-in Jiayuguan City, and the efficiency of green transformation gradually approached the development level of the optimal ideal solution. (3) The proportion of days when the urban air quality meets the standard (X8) and the centralized treatment rate of sewage treatment plants (X13) are the main obstacles to the green transformation and development of Jiayuguan City. |
| DOI | 10.48014/fdg.20250210001 |
| 文章类型 | 研究性论文 |
| 收稿日期 | 2025-02-10 |
| 接收日期 | 2025-03-26 |
| 出版日期 | 2025-03-28 |
| 关键词 | 资源型城市, 熵权-TOPSIS法, 绿色转型效率, 障碍因子, 嘉峪关市 |
| Keywords | Resource based cities, entropy weight TOPSIS Method, green transformation efficiency, obstacle factors, Jiayuguan City |
| 作者 | 张田田, 唐相龙* |
| Author | ZHANG Tiantian, TANG Xianglong* |
| 所在单位 | 兰州交通大学 建筑与城市规划学院, 兰州 730000 |
| Company | School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730000, China |
| 浏览量 | 68 |
| 下载量 | 22 |
| 基金项目 | 国家自然科学基金项目(52068040);苏联援华“156项工程”主导的西北新兴工业城市转型路径分异与规划范型时空响应(1949—2019)。 |
| 参考文献 | [1] 叶昌龙, 殷江滨, 王紫璇, 等. 煤炭资源枯竭型城市转型绩效与障碍因子[J]. 陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 51(06): 84-96. https://doi.org10.15983/j.cnki.jsnu.2023132. [2] 秦建辉, 郭灵辉. 河南省煤炭资源型城市绿色转型经济-环境-社会协调发展研究[J]. 河南理工大学学报(自然科 学版), 2023, 42(05): 93-101. https://doi.org/10.16186/j.cnki.1673-9787.2022110033. [3] 任嘉敏, 郭付友, 赵宏波, 等. 黄河流域资源型城市工业绿色转型绩效评价及时空异质性特征[J]. 中国人口· 资源与环境, 2023, 33(06): 151-160. https://doi.org/10.12062/cpre.20230122 [4] 赵建英. 中国资源型城市转型发展研究回顾与展望[J].经济问题, 2021(11): 17-25. https://doi.org/10.16011/j.cnki.jjwt.2021.11.003. [5] 周冯琦, 尚勇敏. 碳中和目标下中国城市绿色转型的内涵特征与实现路径[J]. 社会科学, 2022(01)51-61. https://doi.org/10.13644/j.cnki.cn31-1112.2022.01.005. [6] 彭定洪, 李旭锋. 资源型城市绿色转型成效评价研究———以云南省为例[J]. 城市问题, 2023(07): 21-32+52. https://doi.org/10.13239/j.bjsshkxy.cswt.230703. [7] 王艳秋, 胡乃联, 周永占. 资源型城市绿色转型的行为协调研究———基于多维博弈视角[J]. 经济与管理, 201 2, 26(09): 5-8. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-3890.2012.09.001 [8] 杜勇. 我国资源型城市生态文明建设评价指标体系研究[J]. 理论月刊, 2014(04): 138-142. https://doi.org/10.14180/j.cnki.1004-0544.2014.04.002. [9] 曾贤刚, 段存儒. 煤炭资源枯竭型城市绿色转型绩效评价与区域差异研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2018, 28(07): 127-135. https://doi.org/10.12062/cpre.20180304 [10] 李汝资, 宋玉祥. 东北地区资源型城市发展路径及其演化机理研究———基于人地关系视角[J]. 东北师大学报(自然科学版), 2014, 46(01): 150-156. https://doi.org/10.11672/dbsdzk2014-01-029 [11] 郭鹏飞, 周英男. 基于扎根理论的中国城市绿色转型政策评价指标提取及建构研究[J]. 管理评论, 2018, 30(08): 257-267. https://doi.org/10.14120/j.cnki.cn11-5057/f.2018.08.021. [12] 姜靖. 高质量发展视角下西北地区资源型城市转型绩效评价及路径研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2021. https://doi.org/10.27204/d.cnki.glzhu.2021.001752. [13] 孙瑞丰, 王家旭, 仵阳. 基于改进熵权-TOPSIS法的资源枯竭型城市低碳转型策略研究———以铜川市为例[J]. 建筑与文化, 2023(07): 110-112. https://doi.org/10.19875/j.cnki.jzywh.2023.07.036. [14] 徐英启, 程钰, 王晶晶. 中国资源型城市碳排放效率时空演变与绿色技术创新影响[J]. 地理研究, 2023, 42(03): 878-894. https://doi.org/10.11821/dlyj020220256 [15] 姜靖, 钟方雷, 杨春林, 等. 高质量发展理念下资源型城市转型绩效及障碍因子分析———以甘肃省金昌市为例[J]. 资源开发与市场, 2020, 36(08): 851-857. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-8141.2020.08.008 |
| 引用本文 | 张田田, 唐相龙. 资源型城市绿色转型效率及障碍因子研究———以甘肃省嘉峪关市为例[J]. 发展地理学前沿, 2025, 4(1): 26-38. |
| Citation | ZHANG Tiantian, TANG Xianglong. Research on the efficiency and obstacle factors of green transformation in resource based cities: a case study of Jiayuguan City, Gansu Province[J]. Frontiers of Development Geography, 2025, 4(1): 26-38. |