2024年5月6日 星期一
中国赋能行业的ESG实践与发展 ———分行业ESG报告分析和评级指标矩阵构建
ESG Practice and Development in China's Enabling Industry:Analysis of ESG Report by Industry and Construction of Rating Index Matrix
摘要

ESG指环境 (Environmental) 、社会 (Social) 和公司治理 (Governance) 三个方面的可持续发展因素, 是评估和衡量企业在环境、社会和治理方面表现和影响的框架。近年来, 中国的ESG实践和发展受到越来越多的关注和推动。然而, 与欧美先进国家相对成熟的ESG披露制度和评级体系相比, 中国的ESG体系仍存在信息披露不全面、评级标准不统一的问题。本文分析了我国赋能行业和带动行业的碳排放水平及ESG披露情况。并以赋能行业中的石油石化、食品饮料、纺织服饰、汽车制造和电子电器为代表, 分析了国内外相应行业的企业ESG报告的差异, 阐明了ESG评级的关键指标。在此基础上, 本研究制定了符合中国国情的分行业ESG评级指标矩阵, 并重点强调了“E”的权重, 以突出企业ESG在双碳目标和循环经济中所能做的贡献, 为建立科学、系统的ESG体系提供了借鉴。该评级指标矩阵有助于解决中国ESG实践中信息披露不全面和评级标准不统一的问题, 促进中国赋能行业在可持续发展方面取得更好的成果。

Abstract

ESG refers to the three sustainability factors of Environmental, Social, and Governance, and is a framework for assessing and measuring corporate's performance and impact in these three areas. China's ESG practices and development have received increasing attention and promotion in recent years. However, compared to the relatively mature ESG disclosure and rating systems in advanced countries in Europe and the United States, China's ESG system still faces challenges such as incomplete information disclosure and inconsistent rating standards. This paper focuses on analyzing the carbon emission levels and ESG disclosure within China's enabling and driving industries. It also takes petroleum and petrochemical, food and beverage, textile and apparel, automobile manufacturing, and electronic and electrical appliances in the enabling industries as representatives analyzes the differences in ESG reports between domestic and foreign enterprises in the corresponding industries, and clarifies the key indicators for ESG ratings. Based on these findings, this study formulates an industry-specific ESG rating index matrix that is tailored to China's national conditions, and emphasizes the weight of “E” to highlight the contribution of corporate ESG to the dual-carbon goal and circular economy, providing a valuable reference for The rating index matrix helps to solve the problems of incomplete information disclosure and inconsistent rating standards in China's ESG practice and promotes the enabling industry in China to achieve better results in sustainable development.  

DOI10.48014/csdr.20231127004
文章类型研究性论文
收稿日期2023-11-27
接收日期2023-12-09
出版日期2024-03-28
关键词ESG实践, ESG披露, 评级指标矩阵, 可持续发展, 中国赋能行业
KeywordsESG practices, ESG disclosure, rating index matrix, sustainable development, China's enabling industry
作者胡佳慧1, 张昊钧1, 郭文靖1, 李月童1, 周楚卉1, 尚瑞琦1, 蒋南青2,*
AuthorHU Jiahui1, ZHANG Haojun1, GUO Wenjing1, LI Yuetong1, ZHOU Chuhui1, SHANG Ruiqi1, JIANG Nanqing2,*
所在单位1. 清华大学深圳国际研究生院, 深圳 518055
2. 青合新碳循环经济与碳中和研究院, 北京 102200
Company1. Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China
2. Institute of Carbon Neutrality and Circular Economy, Beijing 102200, China
浏览量91
下载量29
参考文献[1] Tiantian Meng, Mohamed Hisham Dato Haji Yahya, Zariyawati Mohd Ashhari, et al. ESG performance, investor attention, and company reputation: Threshold model analysis based on panel data from listed companies in China[J]. Heliyon, 2023, 9: e20974.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20974
[2] Hongtao Shen, Honghui Lin, Wenqi Han, et al. ESG in China: A review of practice and research, and future research avenues[J]. China Journal of Accounting Research, 2023, 16: 100325.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2023.100325
[3] 黄渤. 中国特色ESG实践的新要求[J]. 中国金融, 2023, 03: 17-18.
[4] 张飒. ESG体系在我国的应用研究[J]. 金融纵横, 2017, 11: 80-95.
[5] Yan Liu, Ya Deng, Yan Liu, et al. Do disclosure of ESG information policies inhibit the value of heavily polluting Enterprises? —Evidence from China[J]. Heliyon, 2023, 9: e22750.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22750
[6] 伊凌雪, 蒋艺翅, 姚树洁. 企业ESG 实践的价值创造效应研究 ———基于外部压力视角的检验[J]. 南方经济, 2022, 10: 93-110.
DOI:10.19592/j.cnki.scje.391581
[7] Feng He, Xinyao Guo, Pengpeng Yue. Media coverage and corporate ESG performance: Evidence from China[J]. International Review of Financial Analysis, 2024, 91: 103003.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.103003
[8] 阿里巴巴基团, 中环联合认证中心, 碳信托. 范围3+减排超越价值链的企业气候行动方法学[R]. 2022.
[9] Yuru Guan, Yuli Shan, Qi Huang, et al. Assessment to China’s Recent Emission Pattern Shifts[J]. Advancing Earth and Space Sciences, 2021, 9(11): e2021EF002241.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EF002241
[10] Yuli Shan, Qi Huang, Dabo Guan, et al. China CO2 Emission Accounts 2016-2017[J]. Scientific Data, 2020, 7: 54.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0393-y
[11] Yuli Shan, Dabo Guan, Heran Zheng, et al. China CO2 Emission Accounts 1997-2015[J]. Scientific Data, 2018, 5: 190201.
https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.201
[12] 邢萌. 上市公司ESG 信息披露意愿明显增强电力、化工等重点行业加快低碳转型[N]. 证券日报, 2023-05- 22(A01).
[13] 董瑞华. 我国上市公司ESG信息披露情况分析[R]. 海南省绿色金融研究院, 2022.
[14] 赵晓飞. 全面推进环境、社会和公司治理(ESG)———石化业如何打造完善ESG体系?[J]. 中国石油和化工, 2022, 382(12): 10-14.
[15] 李岩, 杜启祥. 石化行业上市公司ESG报告信息披露探究[J]. 科技和产业, 2022, 22(05): 321-325.
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-1807.2022
[16] 徐长杰. 聚焦纺织业ESG建设共创时尚可持续未来[J]. 纺织服装周刊, 2022, 37: 16-19.
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-196X.2022.37.014
[17] 董闻. 海天味业: “国民品牌”ESG评级为何落后?[J]. 董事会, 2020, 07: 46-53.
[18] 高梦祎, 高宇, 高鹏, 等. 新能源汽车制造企业ESG信息披露质量研究[J]. 商业会计, 2023, 04: 99-102.
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5812.2023.04.024
[19] 方玮. 纺织服装企业ESG实践对企业价值的作用及影响路径研究[D]. 北京: 北京外国语大学, 2023.
DOI:10.26962/d.cnki.gbjwu.2023.000400
[20] 崔秀妹. 我国纺织品出口的影响研究[J]. 财讯, 2017(12): 13.
[21] MSCI ESG Research LLC. ESG Ratings Methodology[R]. 2023.
[22] 润灵环球责任评级. 润灵ESG 评级(RKS ESG Ratings)方法简介[Z]. 2020.
[23] 清华大学气候变化与可持续发展研究院. 中国长期低碳发展战略与转型路径研究[R]. 2020.
[24] 中国企业改革与发展研究会. 企业ESG 披露指南[Z]. 2022.
[25] Sustainalytics. ESG Risk Ratings-Methodology[Z]. 2021.
引用本文胡佳慧, 张昊钧, 郭文靖, 等. 中国赋能行业的ESG实践与发展———分行业ESG报告分析和评级指标矩阵构建[J]. 中国可持续发展评论, 2024, 3(1): 17-32.
CitationHU Jiahui, ZHANG Haojun, GUO Wenjing, et al. ESG practice and development in China's enabling industry: analysis of ESG report by industry and construction of rating index matrix[J]. Chinese Sustainable Development Review, 2024, 3(1): 17-32.