摘要 | 国家重大教育政策是执政党和国家对一定时期的教育改革的深层问题、关键环节及发展方向的宏观决策。近几年, 我国重大教育政策集中于发展战略、重大改革、民生关切、国际竞争、意识形态、国家安全六大主题。在地方推进的过程中出现了一些困境, 包括同一主题的改革政策周期性地出台, “老大难”问题却难以真正落实解决; 改革本身的性质使得新问题不断涌现, 加剧了局面的复杂性; 以及出于对社会具体问题的不断适应, 部分政策陷入“左”与“右”钟摆的怪圈, 概括为“悬而未决”、“拖泥带水”、“来回钟摆”三大问题。究其根源是政策推进的国家逻辑过益和地方逻辑失声的双重问题。为此, 我国重大教育政策在推进过程中要实现从国家逻辑向地方逻辑的转换, 应当以形成地方话语为基础, 扩展地方推进的政策空间, 贯彻国家统筹下的政策试验机制, 扩大公众的政策参与度, 寻求政策推进的多方位支持。 |
Abstract | The major national policy is the macro decision of the policy party and the country on the deepseated problems, key links and development directions of the education reform. during a certain period of time. In recent years, major national education policies have focused on six major themes: development strategy, major reforms, peoples livelihood concerns, international competition, ideology, and national security. In the process of local advancement, there have been some difficulties in the process of local promotion, including the periodic introduction of reform. policies on the same theme, but the difficulty in truly implementing and solving the “old big difficult” problems; The nature of reform. itself has led to the emergence of new problems, exacerbating the complexity of the situation. And due to the continuous adaptation to specific social issues, some policies have fallen into a vicious cycle of “left” and “right” swings, summarized as three major problems: “unresolved”, “sloppy” and “pendulum back and forth”. The root cause lies in the dual problem of excessive national logic in policy promotion and the loss of local logic. For this reason, in order to realize the transition from national logic to local logic in the promotion of major national education policies, it should be based on the formation of local discourse, expand the policy space for local promotion, implement the policy experiment mechanism under national coordination, and expand policy participation, seek multi-faceted support for policy advancement. |
DOI | 10.48014/pcp.20241026001 |
文章类型 | 研究性论文 |
收稿日期 | 2024-10-26 |
接收日期 | 2025-02-13 |
出版日期 | 2025-03-28 |
关键词 | 国家教育政策, 政策推进, 地方逻辑 |
Keywords | National education policy, policy promotion, local logic |
作者 | 王甲怡1, 顾秀林2,* |
Author | WANG Jiayi1, GU Xiulin2,* |
所在单位 | 苏州大学 教育学院, 苏州 215123 |
Company | School of Education, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China |
浏览量 | 108 |
下载量 | 30 |
参考文献 | [1] 斯蒂芬· 鲍尔 著, 王玉秋 等译. 政治与教育政策制定———政策社会学的探索[M]. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 2003: 1-12. [2] 范国睿. 历史地全面地发展地审视“减负”问题[J]. 教育发展研究, 2000(06): 74-76. https://doi.org/10.14121/j.cnki.1008-3855.2000.06.019. [3] 葛新斌, 张玲. 我国减负政策执行阻滞及其对策探析———基于“马-萨模式”的视角[J]. 教育发展研究, 2019, 39(02): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.14121/j.cnki.1008-3855.2019.02.003. [4] 盛大林, 吴星晔, 钟笑寒. 新高考改革中的科目选考机制———一个博弈论分析[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2024, 24(01): 17-29. https://doi.org/10.13821/j.cnki.ceq.2024.01.02. [5] 肖滨. 改革开放以来三波机构改革中的钟摆现象———基于领导权-治理权分析框架的解释[J]. 行政论坛, 2024, 31(04): 74-83. https://doi.org/10.16637/j.cnki.23-1360/d.2024.04.006. [6] 石中英. 论教育实践的逻辑[J]. 教育研究, 2006(01): 3-9. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:JYYJ.0.2006-01-001 [7] 阎亚军, 祝怀新. 试论我国基础教育改革的国家逻辑[J]. 教育发展研究, 2020, 40(Z2): 7-13. https://doi.org/10.14121/j.cnki.1008-3855.2020.z2.004. [8] 教育部等九部门. 教育部等九部门关于印发中小学生减 负措施的通知[EB/OL]. [2018-12-28]. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2018-12/29/content_5353320.htm [9] 张海柱. 公共政策的话语建构: 政策过程的后实证主义理论解释[J]. 公共管理与政策评论, 2015(3): 86-93. [10] 艾尔东·莫里斯. 社会运动理论的前沿领域[M]. 刘能译. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2002: 156. [11] 顾秀林, 佘林茂. 省级政府推进新一轮国家减负政策的困境与出路———基于23个地区减负方案的政策分析[J]. 教育发展研究, 2020, 40(Z2): 32-39. https://doi.org/10.14121/j.cnki.1008-3855.2020.z2.007. [12] 康镇. 政策试点的实验主义治理逻辑与转型进路[J]. 求实, 2020(04): 56-69+111. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-8487.2020.04.005 |
引用本文 | 王甲怡, 顾秀林. 我国重大教育政策推进的地方逻辑[J]. 中国教育科学进展, 2025, 4(1): 9-14. |
Citation | WANG Jiayi, GU Xiulin. Local logic for the promotion of major national education policies[J]. Progress of Chinese Pedagogy, 2025, 4(1): 9-14. |