从盖娅假说到COVID-19———评《封锁之后:一次蜕变》

郭佳楠; GUO Jianan

doi:10.48014/fcss.20240324002

从盖娅假说到COVID-19———评《封锁之后:一次蜕变》

From Gaia Hypothesis to COVID-19: Comments on “After Lockdown:A Metamorphosis”

中国社会科学前沿 2024年第1卷第2期页码[11-21] 下载全文[0.7MB] [HTML]

摘要

新冠肺炎疫情在全球持续蔓延, 气候危机、环境问题、生态问题逐渐国际化、全球化, 气候问题的全球治理面临巨大挑战, 亟须进行变革。值此背景, 《封锁之后》一书通过对疫情期间人们生活状况的反思, 表现出社会个体在经历封锁后的蜕变过程, 运用哲学寓言及隐喻的形式讨论人类世界中存在的政治、伦理甚至宇宙学冲突, 从盖娅政治生态观的视角分析了人与自然之关系的本质, 探究人与自然关系合理性问题。作者强调, 地球上生命的实体正日益受到人类的控制与威胁, 需要重建人与自然、科学与政治、事实与价值等这些二元因素之间的内在关联, 探寻解决生态危机的良策。拉图尔以行动者网络理论为主线, 提出超越“强纲领”中的其他对称原则, 倡导开启行动者议会、生态理想国, 发起重构盖娅的制度变革, 但并未就该制度建构的行动者的设置进行充分的论证与提供更多的细节。本书为在理解不同行动者活动状态和组合模式的基础上, 更好地构建人与自然的生命共同体, 提供了一种颇具启发的政治生态观。

Abstract

The COVID-19 epidemic continues to spread around the world. The climate crisis, environmental problems and ecological problems are gradually internationalized and globalized. The global governance of climate problems is facing great challenges and needs to be reformed. Against this background, the book after the blockade reflects on people's living conditions during the epidemic period, showing the transformation process of social individuals after the blockade. It discusses the political, ethical and even cosmological conflicts in the human world in the form. of philosophical fables and metaphors, analyzes the essence of the relationship between man and nature from the perspective of Gaia's political ecological view, and explores the rationality of the relationship between man and nature. The author emphasizes that the life entity on the earth is increasingly controlled and threatened by human beings, and it is necessary to rebuild the internal relationship between human and nature, science and politics, facts and values, and to explore good solutions to the ecological crisis. Latour, taking the actor network theory as the main line, proposed to transcend other symmetry principles in the “strong program”, advocated the opening of the actor Parliament and the ecological Utopia, and initiated the institutional reform. of reconstructing Gaia. However, he did not fully demonstrate and provide more details on the setting of actors in the institutional construction. This book provides an enlightening political ecological view for better building the life community between human and nature on the basis of understanding the activity states and combination modes of different actors.

DOI	10.48014/fcss.20240324002
文章类型	书评
收稿日期	2024-03-24
接收日期	2024-05-13
出版日期	2024-06-28
关键词	COVID-19, 盖娅, 隐喻, 生命共同体, 布鲁诺·拉图尔, 人与自然
Keywords	COVID-19, Gaia, Metaphor, Life community, Bruno Latour, Man and Nature
作者	郭佳楠^1,2
Author	GUO Jianan^1,2
所在单位	1. 亚洲理工学院发展与可持续性学院, 泰国空滦 12120 2. 中国人民大学数字人文研究中心, 北京 100872
Company	1. Asian Institute of Technology, Department of Development and Sustainability, Kong Luan 12120, Thailand 2. Digital Humanities Research Center, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China
浏览量	369
下载量	141
基金项目	郑州工商学院“思想政治理论课研究专项”:ChatGPT介入高校立德树人教育的理论与实践研究; 郑州工商学院科研创新项目:基于ChatGPT类生成式人工智能的红色文化传播现状与策略研究; 2023年度开封市哲学社会科学规划调研课题项目:当代新兴生成式人工智能技术的安全风险及其防范策略(课题编号:ZXSKGH-2023-1043)。
参考文献	[1] 李曈. 重置现代性: 拉图尔思想述评[J]. 自然辩证法通讯, 2020, 42(1): 10-18. DOI:10.15994/j.1000-0763.2020.01.002 [2] BRUNO L. Translated by Julie Rose. After Lockdown: A Metamorphosis[M]. Polity Press, 2021: 33, 44, 56, 77- 80, 90-93, 102-105. https://doi.org/10.33182/joe.v1i2.2212 [3] BRUNO L. Two Bubbles of Unrealism: Learning from the Tragedy of Trump[EB/OL]. https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/two-bubbles-unrealism-learning-tragedy-trump/.2016-11-07 [4] BRUNO L. An Inquiry into Modes of Existence[M]. Harvard University Press, 2013: 102-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/23269995.2014.933055 [5] 钟晓林、洪晓楠. 拉图尔论“非现代性”的人与自然[J]. 自然辩证法通讯, 2019, 41(6): 99-106. https://doi.org/10.15994/j.1000-0763.2019.06.014 [6] [法]布鲁诺·拉图尔. 自然的政治: 如何把科学带入民主[M]. 麦永雄译. 郑州: 河南大学出版社, 2016: 330-335. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591704268181 [7] WATTS J, BRUNO L. This is a Global Catastrophe that has Come from Within[EB/OL]. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/06/bruno-latour-coronavirus-gaiahypothesis-climate-crisis.2020-06-06 [8] [法]布鲁诺·拉图尔. 我们从未现代过[M]. 刘鹏译. 苏州: 苏州大学出版社, 2010: 35-37. https://doi.org/10.1353/mod.1994.0044 [9] BRUNO L. Facing Gaia: Eight Lectures on the New Climatic Regime[M]. Translated by Catherine Porter. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2017: 185-186, 34-35. https://doi.org/10.24242/jclis.v3i1.98 [10] BRUNO L. Down to Earth: Politics in the New Climate Change[M]. Translated by Catherine Porter. London: Polity Press, 2018: 34-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094306119889962v [11] LYONS T W, CHRISTOPHER T R, NOAH J P. The Rise of Oxygen in Earth’s Early Ocean and Atmosphere[J]. Nature, 2014, 506(7488): 307-315. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13068 [12] LOVELOCK J. Beware: Gaia May Destroy Humans Before We Destroy the Earth[EB/OL]. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/nov/02/beware-gaia-theory-climate-crisisearth.2021-11-02. https://doi.org/10.1038/363315a0. [13] BRUNO L. Telling Friends from Foes in the Time of the Anthropocene, in Clive Hamilton et al.(eds. ), The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis: Rethinking Modernity in a New Epoch[M]. New York: Routledge, 2015: 145-155. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315743424 [14] FULLER S. CSI: Kuhn and Latour[J]. Social Studies of Science, 2012, 42(3): 429-434. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312712437228 [15] PICKERING A. The Politics of Theory: Producing Another World, with Some Thoughts on Latour[J]. Journal of Cultural Economy, 2009, 2(1-2): 197-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350903064204 [16] BRUNO L. How to Make Sure Gaia is not a God of Totality? With Special Attention to Toby Tyrrell’s Book on Gaia[J]. Theory, Culture and Society, 2017, 34(2- 3): 61-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276416652700 [17] BLOOR D. Remember the Strong Program[J]? Science, Technology, & Human Values, 1997, 22(3): 373-385. https://doi.org/10.2383/80398 [18] BLOOR D. Anti-Latour[J]. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 1999, 30(1): 81-112, 97. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0039-3681(98)00039-9 [19] BRUNO L, LENTON T M. Extending the Domain of Freedom, or Why Gaia is So Hard to Understand[J]. Critical Inquiry, 2019, 45(3): 659-680. https://doi.org/10.1086/702611 [20] AEENES A, BRUNO L, GAILLARDET J. Giving Depth to the Surface: An Exercise in the Gaia-graphy of Critical Zones[J]. The Anthropocene Review, 2018, 5(2): 120-135. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019618782257 [21] WEST M D. Gaia and COVID: A Review of Bruno Latour’s After Lockdown[J]. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, 2021, 10(12): 36-43. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.610 [22] KIRCHNER J W. The Gaia Hypothesis: Conjectures and Refutations[J]. Climatic Change, 2003, 58(1): 21-45. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023494111532 [23] BRUNO L. On a Possible Triangulation of Some Present Political Positions[J]. Critical Inquiry, 2018, 45(3): 213-226. https://doi.org/10.1086/695376 [24] DELACHAMBRE J P, NICHOLAS M. Modes of Existence Explained to the Moderns, or Bruno Latour’s Plural World[J]. Social Anthropology, 2003, 21(4): 564-575, 66. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12048 [25] BRUNO L. Gaia or Knowledge without Spheres[M]. Aesthetics of Universal Knowledge. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017: 169-201. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42595-5 [26] HAKKARAINEN J, MARKKU K. Bradley’s Reductio of Relations and Formal Ontological Relations[M]. In De Natura Rerum-Scripta in Honorem Professoris Olli Koistinen Sexagesimum Annum Complentis edited by Hemmo Laiho and Arto Repo, Turku: University of Turku, 2016: 246-261. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009070126 [27] BROCKHAUS H. ‘Hope for the future’: Pope Francis asks Mary to intercede for end to pandemic[EB/OL]. in Catholic News Agency, https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/247494/hope-for-the-future-pope-francis-asks-maryto-intercede-for-end-to-pandemic.2021-05-01. [28] SHERMAN J H. On the Emerging Field of Contemplative Studies and Its Relationship to the Study of Spirituality[J]. Spiritus A Journal of Christian Spirituality, 2014, 14(2): 208-229. https://doi.org/10.1353/scs.2014.0031 [29] BRUNO L, MILSTEIN D, et al. Down to earth social movements: an interview with Bruno Latour[J]. Social Movement Studies, 2018, 17(3): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429320798-6 [30] TIMOTHY M, BRUNO L. Gaia 2. 0 Could humans add some level of self-awareness to Earth’s self-regulation[J]? Science, 2018(361): 1066-1068. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau0427
引用本文	郭佳楠. 从盖娅假说到COVID-19———评《封锁之后: 一次蜕变》[J]. 中国社会科学前沿, 2024, 1(2): 11-21.
Citation	GUO Jianan. From Gaia Hypothesis to COVID-19———Comments on “After Lockdown: A Metamorphosis”[J]. Frontiers of Chinese Social Sciences, 2024, 1(2): 11-21.