从某种程度说, 本文所提出的课题都是全新的尝试, 迄今为止, 尽管不乏利用柯布-道格拉斯生产函数对马克思经济理论所试图进行的某种重新诠释, 但是鲜见从生产函数的角度对马克思主义经济学所进行的系统研究。本文揭示了马克思在《资本论》中具有生产函数思想的明确证据, 并强调在《资本论》中并不存在用字母写成的所谓马克思价值等式c +v +m =w这种表述方式, 而《资本论》第三卷中第一次出现的公式W =c+v +m则属于典型的线性生产函数格式。由此还可以认识到纵向的Leontief生产函数其实源于对马克思生产函数中可变资本部分的分解。在研究方法上, 本文基于对生产函数从特殊到一般的研究所取得的多方系列研究成果, 在阐明了马克思生产函数的基本特征为一种线性生产函数之后, 通过将其拓展为CES生产函数形式而实现了一般化, 从而明确了马克思线性生产函数与其他形式生产函数的内在联系。本文的意义主要在于, 通过探索和分析马克思的生产函数思想, 可以加深对马克思经济理论的认识, 特别是可以进一步拓展源于再生产图式的经济增长模型, 并且有利于与其他学派的经济理论进行对比分析。

The topics presented in this paper are all new attempts to some extent, and so far, although there is some kind of attempts to reinterpret Marx's economic theory by using the Cobb-Douglas production function, there are few systematic studies of Marxist economics from the point of view of the production function. This paper reveals clear evidence that Marx had the idea of the production function in Capital and emphasizes that there is no such formulation in Capital as the so-called Marxian value equation c+v+m = w , written in letters, but that the formula W =c+v+m , which appears for the first time in Volume III of Capital, belongs to the typical format of a linear production function. From this it can also be recognized that the vertical Leontief production function actually stems from the decomposition of the variable capital part of Marx's production function. In terms of research methodology, this paper, based on a multi-party series of research results obtained from the study of production functions from the special to the general, after clarifying that the basic characteristic of Marx's production function is a linear production function, it achieves generalization by expanding it into the form. of the CES production function, thus clarifying the intrinsic connection between Marx's linear production function and other forms of production functions. The significance of this paper lies mainly in the fact that by exploring and analyzing Marx's idea of the production thought, we can deepen our understanding of Marx's economic theory, especially by further expanding the model of economic growth derived from the reproduction schema, and be conducive to comparative analyses with the economic theories of other schools of thought.