超越二元对立:哲学视角下探寻人类的和谐共生之道

崔维成; CUI Weicheng

doi:10.48014/jcsb.20250618002

超越二元对立:哲学视角下探寻人类的和谐共生之道

Transcending Binary Opposition:Exploring the Path to Harmonious Coexistence of Humanity from a Philosophical Perspective

新闻与传播科学通报 2025年第2卷第3期页码[45-53] 下载全文[0.7MB]

摘要

本文主要探讨了二元对立思维在人类社会各个方面的普遍性及其影响, 涵盖哲学、国际关系, 以及社会和学术领域。文章认为, “二元共存”哲学提供了一种社会效果更好的选择, 有望应对当代全球挑战。通过探究二元对立思维的本质、影响和局限性, 并将其与“二元共存”哲学的内涵和优势进行对比, 本文旨在启发人们转变思维方式。文章还进一步探讨了实现这一转变的必要步骤, 强调教育、文化传播和媒体的作用, 并着重指出这种思维转变对全球和谐与可持续发展具有重要意义。

Abstract

This paper explores the prevalence and impact of binary opposition thinking in various aspects of human society, from philosophy and international relations to social and academic spheres. This paper posits that the “binary co - existence” philosophy offers a more viable alternative, with the potential to address contemporary global challenges. By exploring the nature, influence, and limitations of binary opposition thinking, and contrasting it with the connotations and advantages of the “binary co - existence” philosophy, this paper aims to inspire a shift in mindset. It further discusses the necessary steps to achieve this transformation, highlighting the role of education, cultural dissemination, and media, and emphasizes the significance of this shift for global harmony and sustainable development.

DOI

10.48014/jcsb.20250618002

文章类型

研究性论文

收稿日期

2025-06-18

接收日期

2025-06-24

出版日期

2025-09-28

关键词

二元对立, 二元共存, 思维范式, 全球挑战, 可持续发展

Keywords

Binary opposition, binary co-existence, thinking paradigm, global challenges, sustainable development

作者

崔维成

Author

CUI Weicheng

所在单位

西湖大学工学院电子信息工程系, 杭州 310030

Company

Department of Electronic and Information Engineering, School of Engineering, Westlake University, Hangzhou 310030, China

浏览量

下载量

基金项目

本方向的研究得到西湖大学校立科研基金项目“复杂系统理论及海洋技术研究”(项目编号:WU2024A001)的资助,该笔经费是由上海鼎衡集团创始人、董事长李多珠先生捐赠。特向李先生和他们的公司员工表示由衷的感谢!

参考文献

[1] Russell B. A History of Western Philosophy[M]. Simon & Schuster, 1945.
[2] Whitaker A. Einstein, Bohr and the quantum dilemma— From quantum theory to quantum information(2nd Ed.)[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
[3] Walach H. Beyond a Materialist Worldview[M]. Scientific and Medical Network, 2019.
[4] Zadeh L A. Fuzzy Logic[J]. Computer, 1988, 21(4): 83-93.
https://doi.org/10.1109/2.53.
[5] Schrödinger E. What is life? The physical aspect of the living cell[M ]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1944.
[6] Cui W. A Simple Idea on the Unification of Einstein- Bohr Controversy[J]. Annals of Social Sciences & Management studies. 2019, 2(5): 555597.
https://doi.org/10.19080/ASM.2019.02.555597.
[7] 池田大作, 阿· 汤因比(著). 荀春生, 朱继征, 陈国梁(译). 展望21世纪:汤因比与池田大作对话录[M]. 国际文化出版公司, 1999.
[8] Capra F. The Tao of physics[M]. Boulder, Colorado: Shambhala Publications, 1975.
[9] Descartes R. Discourse on method and the meditations[M]. London: Penguin, 1968.
[10] Cui W. On the philosophical ontology for a general system theory[J]. Philosophy Study, 2021, 11(6): 443-458.
https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5313/2021.06.002.
[11] Laumakis S J. An introduction to Buddhist philosophy[M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
[12] 慈诚罗珠堪布(著). 索达吉堪布(译). 前世今生论[M]. 佛哲书舍, 2013. Retrived from www. fosss. net/ Book/QianShiJinSheng/qsjs0. html.
[13] Kuhn T S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions[M]. University of Chicago Press, 1962.
[14] Houran J. Introduction to the Special Subsection: Contemplating the BICS essay contest on postmortem survival[J]. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 2022, 36(2): 348-349.
https://doi.org/10.31275/20222659.
[15] Capra F. The web of life: A new scientific understanding of living systems[M]. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books, 1996.

引用本文

崔维成. 超越二元对立:哲学视角下探寻人类的和谐共生之道[J]. 新闻与传播科学通报, 2025, 2(3): 45-53.

Citation

CUI Weicheng. Transcending binary opposition: exploring the path to harmonious coexistence of humanity from a philosophical perspective[J]. Journalism and Communication Science Bulletin, 2025, 2(3): 45-53.