2024年3月29日 星期五
基于ISO8402的博士生教育质量内涵研究
Research on the Connotation of Doctoral Education Quality based on ISO8402
摘要

在我国由研究生教育大国向研究生教育强国迈进的征程上, 博士生教育质量内涵研究十分必要且很有意义。博士生教育质量既是博士生教育的出发点和根本目的, 也是判断或评价博士生教育发展程度、目标达成程度的重要依据。本研究基于ISO8402质量内涵将博士生教育质量定义为“博士生教育系统满足个体、社会需要的能力与水平。”博士生教育质量包含博士生教育内适质量和博士生教育外适质量。内适质量是外适质量实现的根本动力和主要原因, 外适质量是内适质量的结果形式和外在表现。厘清博士生教育质量内涵, 有助于确立博士生教育发展的主要着力点并推动我国博士生教育的高质量发展。

Abstract

In China’s journey from being “big” to “powerful” in postgraduate education, it is necessary and meaningful to study “the connotation of the quality of postgraduate education”. The quality of doctoral education is not only the starting point and fundamental purpose of doctoral education, but also an important basis for assessing or evaluating the development and goal achievement of doctoral education. Based on ISO8402 quality connotation, the research defines the quality of doctoral education as “the ability and level of the doctoral education system to meet the needs of individuals and the society. ” The quality of doctoral education includes the internal and external quality of doctoral education. The internal quality is the fundamental driving force and main reason for the realization of the external quality, and the external quality is the result form. and external expression of the internal quality. Clarifying the connotation of doctoral education quality will help to establish the main focus of doctoral education development, thus promoting the high-quality development of doctoral education in China.  

DOI10.48014/pcp.20221109001
文章类型研究性论文
收稿日期2022-11-16
接收日期2022-12-23
出版日期2022-12-28
关键词博士生教育, 质量, 内涵, ISO8402
KeywordsDoctoral education, quality, connotation
作者娄枝*, 汪为
AuthorLOU Zhi*, WANG Wei
所在单位中国民航大学马克思主义学院, 天津 300300
CompanySchool of Marxism, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China
浏览量889
下载量273
基金项目2021年中国民航大学研究生教育教学改革与研究项目“学科建设状态监测的理论与实践”(项目编号:YJSY06)
参考文献[1] Maresi Nerad. Introduction. //In: Globalization and Its Impacts on the Quality of PhD Education. Global Perspectives on Higher Education[M]. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam, 2014: 1-3.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-569-4_1
[2] 教育部. 教育发展统计公报[EB/OL].(2021-08-27)[2022-05-23].
http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_sjzl/sjzl_fztjgb/.
[3] Online Etymology Dictionary[C].
https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=quality/,2022-05-02.
[4] [美]约瑟夫·朱兰, A 布兰顿·戈弗雷. 朱兰质量手册[M]. 焦叔斌, 译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2003.
[5] 陈小明. ISO9000知识问答[M]. 广东: 广东经济出版社, 1999: 319.
[6] 翟亚军. 大学学科建设模式研究[D]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2007: 37.
[7] 刘仲林. 现代交叉科学[M]. 杭州: 浙江教育出版社, 1998: 19.
[8] 新华网. 办好中国特色世界一流大学, 习近平提出这样干[EB/OL].(2018-05-03)[2022-08-29].
http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2018-05/03/c_1122779763.htm.
[9]邵宏润. 基于学生感知的博士生教育服务质量研究[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2018: 1.
引用本文娄枝, 汪为. 基于ISO8402的博士生教育质量内涵研究[J]. 中国教育科学进展, 2022, 1(1): 1-6.
CitationLOU Zhi, WANG Wei. Research on the connotation of doctoral education quality based on ISO8402[J]. Progress of Chinese Pedagogy, 2022, 1(1): 1-6.