我国学习投入研究的知识图景与本土特色 ———基于CNKI和CSSCI数据库的文献计量分析

The Knowledge Landscape and Local Characteristics of Learning Engagement Research in China:A Bibliometric Analysis Based on CNKI and CSSCI

学习投入研究自20世纪末进入我国学者视野后, 成果涌现。以分别来自中国知网、中文社会科学引文索引数据库的2389篇、199篇有效施引文献及后者对应的4039篇有效被引文献为分析样本, 综合使用文献计量法与传统文献法, 描绘并呈现包含我国学习投入研究文献积累历程、主要研究力量、知识基础和热点主题的四维知识图景, 并基于此精炼本土特色。研究发现: (1) 我国学习投入研究在发展中生成了五点自身属性: 文献积累历程上经历“萌芽期-成长期”两大阶段; 主要研究力量上集综合性大学与师范类高校学者之合力; 研究内容上形成了“多作用机制探索, 少理论概念建构”的旨趣分布; 研究方法上表现出“量化研究为主, 质性研究匮乏”的递减规律; 研究对象 上呈现出“聚焦高等教育, 纵贯初等教育、中等教育与高等教育三大阶段”的关注特征。 (2) 我国学习投入研究在比较中获致了众多异质发现: 主要包括更贴近我国教育实践的工具开发与更贴合我国学习者经历的研究结果。

The study of learning engagement has been fruitful since it entered the vision of Chinese scholars at the end of the 20th century. Taking 2, 389 and 199 valid citing documents from CNKI and CSSCI Database respectively, and the corresponding 4039 cited documents from the latter as the analyzed samples, and comprehensively using bibliometric method and traditional bibliographic method, this paper describes and presents a four-dimensional knowledge picture containing the accumulation history of literature on learning input research in China, main research teams, knowledge base and hot topics of learning engagement research in China, and refines local characteristics based on this. It is found that: (1) Chinese learning engagement research has generated five attributes in its process of development: the process of document accumulation has gone through two stages of “budding period and growth period”; the main research team is composed of scholars from comprehensive universities and normal colleges and universities; the research content has formed the distribution of “multi-action mechanism exploration, less theoretical concept construction”; the research method shows a decreasing law of “more quantitative research, less qualitative research”; research objects presents the characteristics of “focusing on higher education and running through the three stages of primary education, secondary education and higher education”. (2) Chinese learning engagement research has obtained many heterogeneous findings in the comparison: mainly including the development of tools that are closer to Chinese educational practice and the findings that are more in line with the experience of Chinese learners.