2024年5月4日 星期六
研招异地借考:晚清顺天与山西乡试借闱的历史启示
Cross-regional Participation in National Graduate Admission Examination:The Historical Implications of Shuntian and Shanxi Provincial Examination in the Late Qing Dynasty
摘要

晚清壬寅、癸卯二科乡试是中国科举史上的最后两场乡试。然而, 在内忧外患的侵扰之下, 清廷为延续科举取士之传统, 实现拔擢人才之目的, 不得不采取折中之法, 借河南贡院举行顺天乡试, 借陕西贡院举行山西乡试, 由此出现了千年科举时代少有的借闱现象。比较两省乡试借闱的实施过程, 发现二者在时间优先级、录送复杂性、官员派遣以及考试内容等方面存在诸多差异, 但是从借闱之目标、原则等考试理念层面来看, 两省乡试又具有明显的共同特征, 包括注重乡试组织的简便性、尊重各省乡试的独立性、坚守科举取士的公平性。鉴古知今, 晚清乡试借闱与当今研招异地借考可谓异曲同工, 其实践经验对提高研招现代化治理水平与能力具有重要的历史启示, 一应加强研招异地借考国家制度建设, 二应重视各省区研招标准化考场建设, 三应健全研招异地借考资源协调机制。

Abstract

In the late Qing Dynasty, Renyin and Guimao rural examinations were the last two rural examinations in the history of Chinese imperial examinations. However, under the intrusion of domestic troubles and foreign invaders, the Qing Court had to adopt a compromise method in order to continue the tradition of selecting scholars through the imperial examinations and pick out and promote talents. The imperial examinations were held in Shuntian County in Henan Province and in Shanxi Province in Shaanxi Province, which led to the rare phenomenon of borrowing Wei in the imperial examinations of thousands of years. When the implementation process of the two provinces of the provincial exams borrowed exams are compared, it is found that there are many differences between the two provinces in terms of the time priority, the complexity of admission and delivery, the dispatch of officials and the content of the examination. However, from the perspective of the examination concepts such as the objectives and principles of the borrowed exams, the two provinces have obvious common features, including paying attention to the simplicity of the township examination organization, respecting the independence of provincial township examination, and adhering to the fairness of the imperial examination. From the perspective of the past, the practice experience in the late Qing Dynasty is similar to that in the present. It has important historical revelation for improving the management level and ability of the modernization of the postgraduate entrance examination. Firstly, we should strengthen the construction of the national system of the postgraduate entrance examination in different places, secondly, we should attach importance to the construction of standardized examination centers in different provinces and regions, and thirdly, we should improve the coordination mechanism of the resources of the postgraduate entrance examination in different places.  

DOI10.48014/tpcp.20230522001
文章类型研究性论文
收稿日期2023-05-23
接收日期2023-07-07
出版日期2023-12-28
关键词晚清, 乡试借闱, 研招, 异地借考
KeywordsLate Qing Dynasty, provincial-level examination-in-charge, postgraduate entrance, taking examination in a different place
作者傅冠华*, 李木洲
AuthorFU Guanhua*, LI Muzhou
所在单位浙江大学 科举学与考试研究中心, 杭州 310058.
CompanyCenter for Study of Imperial Examination and Examination Research, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
浏览量151
下载量36
基金项目教育部哲学社会科学研究重大委托项目“习近平总书记关于中国特色世界一流大学建设的重要论述及其溯源研究”(21JZDW002).
参考文献[1] 中华人民共和国教育部. 教育部部署进一步做好2023 年研究生考试组织工作[EB/OL].(2022-12-07)[2022- 12-21].
http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/gzdt_gzdt/s5987/202212/t20221207_1023944.html.
[2](清)陈夔龙. 庸盦尚书奏议[M]//沈云龙. 近代中国史料丛刊·第51辑·第507册. 台北: 文海出版社, 1970: 487-491.
[3] 王铁崖. 中外旧约章汇编[M]. 北京: 三联书店, 1957: 102.
[4] 八咏楼主人. 西巡回銮始末记[M]. 台北: 文海出版社, 1972: 233.
[5] 顾廷龙, 戴逸. 李鸿章全集16:奏议十六[M]. 合肥: 安徽教育出版社, 2008: 285.
[6] 中国第一历史档案馆. 光绪朝上谕档: 二七[M]. 桂林: 广西师范大学出版社, 1996.
[7] 顾廷龙, 戴逸. 李鸿章全集28:电报[M]. 合肥: 安徽教育出版社, 2008.
[8] 苑书义. 张之洞全集·第10册·电牍[M]. 石家庄: 河北人民出版社. 1998.
[9] Ruxton I C, Hoare J. The semi-official letters of British envoy Sir Ernest Satow from Japan and China(1895— 1906). Raleigh: Lulu Press, 2007.
[10] 王炜. 《清实录》科举史料汇编[M].武汉: 武汉大学出 版社, 2009.
[11](清)岑春煊. 山西巡抚岑春煊为晋省乡试借用豫闱并 腾挪日期请饬部核议事奏折[A]//朱琼臻. 光绪末年山西陕西合闱乡试档案. 历史档案, 2022(02): 31.
[12](清)赵尔巽. 护理山西巡抚赵尔巽等为晋省癸卯乡试诸多窒碍请展缓至下届一并举行事奏折[A]//朱琼臻. 光绪末年山西陕西合闱乡试档案. 历史档案, 2022(02): 37-38.
[13] 论汴省举行乡会试之非宜[N]. 申报, 1903-5-13.
[14] 中国第一历史档案馆. 光绪朝朱批奏摺: 一零五辑[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1996: 211.
[15] 张华腾, 范珂. 清末壬寅癸卯科陕晋合闱乡试探析[J]. 山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2017, 40(04): 75-82.
DOI:10.13451/j.cnki.shanxi.univ(phil.soc.).2017.04.010
[16](清)岑春煊. 山西巡抚岑春煊等为陕晋两省乡试请合闱办理事奏折[A]//朱琼臻. 光绪末年山西陕西合闱乡试档案. 历史档案, 2022(02): 31-32.
[17] 礼部奏顺天借闱乡试变通章程折[N]. 申报, 1902- 4-12.
[18] 录科须知[N]. 申报, 1902-4-17.
[19] 李世愉, 胡平. 中国科举制度通史·清代卷[M]. 上海: 上海人民出版社. 2017.
[20] 光绪二十八年七月初三日京报全录[N]. 申报, 1902- 8-19.
[21](清)奎润. 钦定科场条例[M]. 李兵, 袁建辉,点校. 长沙: 岳麓书社, 2020.
[22](清)奕劻. 政务处大臣奕劻等为遵旨议复陕晋两省乡试合闱办理事奏折[A]//朱琼臻. 光绪末年山西陕西合闱乡试档案. 历史档案, 2022(02): 32.
[23] 戴逸. 康有为诗文选[M]. 成都: 巴蜀书社, 2011.
[24] 苑书义. 张之洞全集·第2册[M]. 石家庄: 河北人民 出版社, 1998.
[25] 礼部. 遵议乡会试详细章程疏[A]//王树敏, 王延熙. 皇清道咸同光奏议·卷8·变法类·科举第1册, 1969: 461-464.
[26] 刘海峰. 科举革废与辛亥革命[J]. 华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2012, 51(03): 131-136.
[27] 宋方青. 科举革废与清末法政教育[J]. 厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2009(05): 38-44+105.
[28] 张亚群. 科举革废与近代中国高等教育的转型[M]. 武汉:华中师范大学出版社. 2005: 101.
[29] 国家图书馆. 清代乡试文献集成·第75册[M]. 北京: 国家图书馆出版社. 2020: 213-218.
[30] 刘海峰. 科举学的教育视角[J].理论月刊, 2009(05): 5-9.
[31] 刘海峰. “科举学位说”可以确立[J]. 学位与研究生教育, 2002(Z2): 69-73.
DOI:10.16750/j.adge.2002.z2.023
[32] 姜晓蓉. 我省全力保障考试防疫“双安全” [N]. 浙江日报, 2021-12-25.
[33] 陕西省教育考试院. 关于参加2022年全国硕士研究生招生考试滞留在陕考生申请借考的公告[EB/OL].(2021-12-16)[2023-2-27].
http://jyt.shaanxi.gov.cn/news/gsgg/202112/16/20038.html.
[34] 傅冠华, 许露. 咸丰九年科举借闱之争及其当代启示[J]. 教育与考试, 2022(01): 38-46.
DOI:10.16391/j.cnki.jyks.2022.01.005
引用本文傅冠华, 李木洲. 研招异地借考: 晚清顺天与山西乡试借闱的历史启示[J]. 中国教育学理论与实践, 2023, 2(4): 97-105.
CitationFU Guanhua, LI Muzhou. Cross-regional participation in national graduate admission examination: the historical implications of Shuntian and Shanxi Provincial examination in the Late Qing Dynasty[J]. Theory and Practice of Chinese Pedagogy, 2023, 2(4): 97-105.