建设终身学习社会背景下两种在线教育设计案例比较分析研究

田梦; TIAN Meng; 胡夏楠; HU Xianan

doi:10.48014/tpcp.20241128001

建设终身学习社会背景下两种在线教育设计案例比较分析研究

Comparative Analysis and Research on Two Online Education Design Cases in the Context of Building a Lifelong Learning Society

中国教育学理论与实践 2025年第4卷第1期页码[27-35] 下载全文[0.9MB]

摘要

在终身学习社会背景下, 探索在线教育设计至关重要。本文分析了在线教学模式的创新, 特别是MOOC+SPOC+在线直播模式和校本云平台+校本资源+在线直播模式。通过案例分析展示了清华大学和北京某中学在实施这两种模式中的具体做法, 以及如何根据不同学习动机设计个性化教学策略, 以满足多样化学习需求。研究表明, 设计在线教育时, 应竭力平衡教学策略、情感需求和技术支持等多方面的内容, 采取混合式教学设计, 搭建互动平台, 优化数字治理体系, 利用数字技术推进终身学习体系转型, 并为不同学习动机的学习者设计个性化教学策略, 以促进终身学习社会的发展。

Abstract

In the context of a lifelong learning society, it is crucial to explore online education design. This article analyses the innovation of online teaching models, especially the MOOC + SPOC + live streaming model and the school-based cloud platform. + school-based resources + live streaming model. Case studies demonstrate the specific practices of Tsinghua University and a Beijing middle school in implementing these two models and how to design personalized teaching strategies based on different learning motives to meet diverse learning needs. The results show that when creating online education models, every effort should be made to balance various aspects, such as teaching strategies, emotional needs and technical support. We should adopt a blended teaching design, build an interactive platform, and optimize the digital governance system to promote the transformation of the lifelong learning system using digital technology. Meanwhile, it is essential to provide personalized teaching strategies for learners with different learning motivations to promote the development of a lifelong learning society.

DOI	10.48014/tpcp.20241128001
文章类型	研究性论文
收稿日期	2024-11-28
接收日期	2025-01-21
出版日期	2025-03-28
关键词	终身学习, 学习型社会, 在线教育, 教学模式, 学习动机
Keywords	Lifelong learning, learning society, online education, teaching models, learning motivation
作者	田梦¹, 胡夏楠^2,*
Author	TIAN Meng¹, HU Xianan^2,*
所在单位	1. 大兴区社区学院, 北京 102699 2. 安庆师范大学教育科学学院, 安庆 246133
Company	1. Daxing District Community College, Beijing 102699, China 2. School of Education Science, Anqing Normal University, Anqing 246133, China
浏览量	129
下载量	36
参考文献	[1] 钱小龙, 李雯璟, 宋子昀. 面向终身学习的在线教育理论模型: 目标、内容、方法与评估[J]. 江汉大学学报(社会科学版), 2021: 12. https://doi.org/10.16387/j.cnki.42-1867/c.2021.06.012 [2] 刘昌亚. 加快推进教育现代化开启建设教育强国新征程———《中国教育现代化2035》解读[J]. 教育研究, 2019, 40(11): 4-16. [3] 刘欣欣. 基于网络资源的混合式教学改革与实践研究[J]. 卫生职业教育, 2021(3): 61-63. [4] 张优良, 尚俊杰. “互联网+”与中国高等教育变革前景[J]. 现代远程教育研究, 2018(1): 15-23. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-5195.2018.01.002 [5] 5G通信调研报告( http://www.doc88.com)》-2019. [6] 姜楠, 曾祥跃. 终身一体在线学习系统建构的路径与机制[J]. 中国成人教育, 2022: 5. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-6577.2022.03.001 [7] Tekkol, ̇I. A, Demirel, M. An Investigation of Self-Directed Learning Skills of Undergraduate Students[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2018(9): 23-24. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02324. [8] Chaisongkram, P. LIFELONG LEARNING and ELEARING AWARENESS: THE CASE STUDY of INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE STUDENTS at SUAN SUNANDHA RAJABHAT UNIVERSITY[J]. The EUrASEANs: journal on global socio-economic dynamics, 2020, 4(23): 56-62. [9] Gündüz, A. Y. The Importance of Investigating Students’ Lifelong Learning Levels and Perceptions of 21st-Century Skills[J]. International e-journal of educational studies, 2023, 7(15): 788-796. https://doi.org/10.31458/iejes.1346220. [10] Luo, S. The Current Landscape and Future Direction of Curriculum Reform in China[J]. Future in Educational Research, 2023, 1(1): 5-16. [11] Kebritchi, M, Lipschuetz, A, Santiague, L. Issues and Challenges for Teaching Successful Online Courses in Higher Education[J]. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 2017, 46(1): 4-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239516661713. [12] Dumulescu, D, Pop-P􀅢curar, I, Necula, C. V. Learning Design for Future Higher Education - Insights from the Time of COVID-19[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2021, 12: 647948. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.647948. [13] Baldwin, S. J, Ching, Y. -H. An Online Course Design Checklist: Development and Users’ Perceptions[J]. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 2018, 31(1): 156-172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9199-8. [14] Martin, F, Bolliger, D. U. Designing Online Learning in Higher Education[J]. Handbook of open, distance and digital education, 2023: 1217-1236. [15] Kızılcık, H. H, Dewan Türüdü, A. S. Humanising Online Teaching through Care-Centred Pedagogies[J]. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2022, 38(4): 143-159. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7872. [16] Aldowah, H, Al-Samarraie, H, Ghazal, S. How Course, Contextual, and Technological Challenges Are Associated with Instructors’ Individual Challenges to Successfully Implement E-Learning: A Developing Country Perspective[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 48792-48806. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2910148. [17] Guy, R. G. Interactivity and E-Learning: The Student Perspective[J]. 2016. [18] Berestova, A, Tatyana, A, Olga, M, Liudmila, L, Alisa, L. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues Constructivist Pedagogy in E-Learning: Solving Problems of Interaction with a Student. In Constructivist pedagogy in E-learning: Solving problems of interaction with a student[C]; Birlesik Dunya Yenilik Arastirma ve Yayincilik Merkezi, 2022, 10: I343-I356 [19] Stark, E. Examining the Role of Motivation and Learning Strategies in the Success of Online vs. Face-To-Face Courses[J]. Online Learning, 2019, 23(3): 234-251. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i3.1556. [20] LIANG, W. Towards a Set of Design Principles for Technology-Assisted Critical-Thinking Cultivation: A Synthesis of Research in English Language Education[J]. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2022, 47: 101203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101203. [21] Johnson, M. D, Narayanan, A, Sawaya, W. J. Effects of Course and Instructor Characteristics on Student Evaluation of Teaching across a College of Engineering[J]. Journal of Engineering Education, 2013, 102(2): 289-318. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20013. [22] Mayende G, Prinz A, Isabwe G M N, et al. Learning groups for MOOCs lessons for online learning in higher education[C]. Interactive Collaborative Learning: Proceedings of the 19th ICL Conference-Volume 1. Springer International Publishing, 2017: 185-198. [23] Lukosch H, Kurapati S, Bekebrede G, et al. Design considerations for building a scalable digital version of a multi-player educational board game for a MOOC in logistics and transportation[C]. Games and Learning Alliance: 5th International Conference, GALA 2016, Utrecht, The Netherlands, December 5-7, 2016, Proceedings 5. Springer International Publishing, 2016: 167-176. [24] 王珠珠. 教育信息化2. 0: 核心要义与实施建议[J]. 中国远程教育, 2018(07): 5-8. https://doi.org/10.13541/j.cnki.chinade.20180725.001.
引用本文	田梦, 胡夏楠. 建设终身学习社会背景下两种在线教育设计案例比较分析研究[J]. 中国教育学理论与实践,2025, 4(1): 27-35.
Citation	TIAN Meng, HU Xianan. Comparative analysis and research on two online education design cases in the context of building a lifelong learning society[J]. Theory and Practice of Chinese Pedagogy, 2025, 4(1): 27-35.