2025年5月24日 星期六
“教、学、评”一致性研究的综述
A Review of Research on the Coherence of Teaching, Learning and Assessmen
摘要

自改革开放以来, 我国在“教、学、评”一致性课程评价研究方面已经走过了四十余年的历程。这一研究领域先后经历了“拿来主义”、“立足国情”和“深化改革”三个阶段。在这个过程中, 学界对有教无评、有评无促、以评促学、教学评一体化等基本评价元素的探讨取得了明显的成果和进展。然而, 未来的“教、学、评”一致性研究需要更加关注促进课程实施、解码课程标准、组织评估任务和实施学习活动, 并对一致性功能进行更深入的反思和延伸。为了实现这一目标, 我们需要采取一系列措施。首先, 加强对课程实施的促进。同时, 还需要建立有效的反馈机制, 及时了解课程实施中的问题和挑战, 并采取相应的措施加以解决。其次, 深入解码课程标准。第三, 组织好评估任务。最后, 积极实施学习活动。总之, 未来的“教、学、评”一致性研究需要更加关注促进课程实施、解码课程标准、组织评估任务和实施学习活动, 并对一致性功能进行更深入的反思和延伸。

Abstract

Since the reform. and opening-up, China has gone through more than 40 years of research in the field of “teaching, learning and assessment” consistency in curriculum evaluation. This area of research has gone through three stages: “fetishism”, “based on national conditions” and “deepening reform”. During this process, the academic community has made significant achievements and progress in exploring the basic elements of assessment, such as teaching without assessment, assessment without facilitation, assessment for learning, and the integration of teaching and assessment. However, future research on the coherence of teaching, learning and assessment needs to pay more attention to facilitating curriculum implementation, decoding curriculum standards, organizing assessment tasks and implementing learning activities, as well as reflecting on and extending the function of coherence in greater depth. In order to achieve this goal, we need to take a series of measures. Firstly, the facilitation of curriculum implementation needs to be strengthened. It is also necessary to establish an effective feedback mechanism to keep abreast of the problems and challenges in curriculum implementation and take appropriate measures to address them. Secondly, indepth decoding of curriculum standards is necessary. Thirdly, organize assessment tasks. Finally, actively implementing learning activities should be taken. In conclusion, future research on the coherence of teaching, learning and assessment needs to pay more attention to facilitating curriculum implementation, decoding curriculum standards, organizing assessment tasks and implementing learning activities, as well as reflecting on and extending the function of coherence in a more in-depth manner.  

DOI10.48014/tpcp.20230926001
文章类型综 述
收稿日期2023-09-26
接收日期2024-03-10
出版日期2024-09-28
关键词教学评一致性, 课程标准, 课程评价
KeywordsTeaching evaluation consistency, curriculum standards, curriculum evaluation
作者刘瑶
AuthorLIU Yao
所在单位南宁师范大学教育科学学院, 南宁 530299
CompanyNanning Normal University, College of Educational Sciences, Nanning 530299, China
浏览量539
下载量284
参考文献[1] 张志勇. 教学评一致性的背景追溯、理论内涵与安全分析[J]. 中学政治教学参考, 2022(18): 26-29.
[2] 钟素丽. 教、学、评一致: 课堂评价中的问题及优化[J]. 语文教学通讯, 2021(36): 76-77.
[3] 张顺清. “教、学、评一致性”与“教、学、评一体化”的起源 和含义[J]. 中学化学教学参考, 2019(7): 4-5.
[4] 侯桂红. 对历史课堂教、学、评一体化(一致性)的几点探讨[J]. 历史教学问题, 2021(04): 141-147.
https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-5636.2021.04.020
[5] 逄凌晖. 教学评一致: 逆向设计中的正向思维[J]. 中国教师, 2020(09): 62-64.
https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-2051.2020.09.017
[6] 任洁. 如何在课堂上实施教、学、评一体化[J]. 文教资料, 2020(18): 227-229.
https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-8359.2020.18.087
[7] 马泽燕, 傅兴春. 基于新课标的教、学、评一体化研究进展[J]. 化学教与学, 2020(05): 11-15+42.
https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-0546.2020.05.003.
[8] 黄吉秀. 如何在高中英语课中做到“教学评一致”[J]. 课程教育研究, 2019(30): 92-93.
[9] 王云生. “教、学、评”一体化的内涵与实施的探索[J]. 化学教学, 2019(05): 8-10+16.
https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-6629.2019.05.002
[10] 崔允漷, 雷浩. 教-学-评一致性三因素理论模型的建构[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2015, 33(04): 15-22.
https://doi.org/10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2015.04.003
[11] 崔允漷, 夏雪梅. “教-学-评一致性”:意义与含义[J]. 中小学管理, 2013(01): 4-6.
[12] 饶黎. 教学评一体化: 实现有效教学的途径[J]. 林区教 学, 2022(9): 80-83.
https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-6714.2022.09.020.
[13] 陈玉琨, 李如海. 我国教育评价发展的世纪回顾与未来展望[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2000(01): 1-12.
https://doi.org/10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2000.01.001
[14] 洪宏. “教-学-评”一体化的初中语文阅读教学设计研究[D]. 西宁: 青海师范大学, 2023.
[15] 戚业国, 陈玉琨. 论素质教育目标体系框架的构建[J]. 教育研究, 2000(01): 16-19
引用本文刘瑶. “教、学、评”一致性研究的综述[J]. 中国教育学理论与实践, 2024, 3(3): 92-97.
CitationLIU Yao. A review of research on the coherence of teaching, learning and assessment[J]. Theory and Practice of Chinese Pedagogy, 2024, 3(3): 92-97.