2024年5月4日 星期六
“激情抗议” : “山东问题”下留美中国学生 “抵制日货”的价值选择
“Passionate Protest”:The Value Choice of Chinese Students Studying in the United States to“Resist Japanese Goods” under the“Shandong Issue”
摘要

1919年, 中国在巴黎和会上谈判失败, 一种激烈的民族意识迅速扩展到了整个知识群体, 留美生通过“抵制日货”这一“激情革命”的方式, 表达对这一事态的密切关注。就留学生对“抵制日货”的态度来看, 大部分留学生萌发了民族意识的情绪, 而以少数留学生为代表则对以上问题更倾向于采取一种趋于“民族自决”、更具有民族内在觉醒意识的自强方式。体现了书生报国的另一种面相。

Abstract

After the failure of China's negotiations at the Paris Peace Conference in 1919, a fierce national consciousness quickly spread to the entire intellectual community, especially among Chinese students in the United States, who remained intensely national even though they were on the other side of the ocean. Under the stimulation of domestic and foreign difficulties, the call for national salvation is increasingly rising, and the connection between“scholar” and“national salvation” has become close, and many students consciously take the mission of national salvation to themselves. Students in the United States expressed their close attention to this situation through the“passionate revolution” of“boycotting Japanese goods”. For the students studying in the United States, although they live on the other side of the ocean, the number is not large compared with the vigorous protests in China, but they inevitably participate in the tide of national salvation and become one of the important forces for national salvation. In terms of the attitude of foreign students to“boycott Japanese goods”, most of them have a deep-rooted national consciousness in China since ancient times, while a minority of them, as representatives, are more inclined to adopt a way of self-improvement that tends to“national self-determination” and has more internal awareness of the nation. Reflects the scholar to serve the country another face. It can be said that the value choices and a series of historical activities of students studying in the United States driven by patriotic spirit reflect the dual interaction between students studying in the United States and the fate of the country in modern times, and shine the light of pure patriotic ideals of overseas students on the other side.  

DOI10.48014/tpcp.20230206001
文章类型研究性论文
收稿日期2023-02-06
接收日期2023-03-07
出版日期2023-03-28
关键词近代留学教育, “抵制日货”, “民族自决”, 留美中国学生, 价值选择
KeywordsStudy abroad education in modern times, “boycott Japanese goods”, “national self-determination”, Chinese students in the United States, value choice
作者张睦楚1,2
AuthorZHANG Muchu1,2
所在单位1. 云南师范大学教育学部, 昆明 650500
2. 美国加州伯克利大学亚洲研究中心, 伯克利 94720 2318
Company1. Yunnan Normal University, Faculty of Education, Kunming 650500, China
2. University of California, Berkeley CA 94720 2318, USA
浏览量410
下载量274
基金项目本文系中国博士后科学基金第66批面上资助“家国情怀与使命担当:近代留美中国学生在美政治活动研究(1909—1937)”(资助编号:2019M662094)、浙江省博士后项目择优资助“‘世界性’与‘本土性’的互动:浙籍留美学人与浙江高等教育早期现代化研究”(编号:222485/一等资助)阶段性研究成果。
参考文献[1] 胡欣. 美国帝国思想的对外政策含义: 对国家身份、意识形态和国际秩序观的历史解读[M]. 南京: 江苏人民出版社, 2017: 290.
[2] 留美学生组织爱国委员会[N]. 时报, 1919-4-14(3).
[3] 留学生亦应回国从军[N]. 中央日报, 1920-10-21(3).
[4] The Chinese Students’Alliance in the United States of America. Aplea for patriotic sanity: an open letter to all Chinese students[J]. The Chinese Students’Monthly, 1915, 10: 400.
[5] 雷海宗. 强权即公理说[J]. 留美学生季报, 1926(1): 85-92.
[6] 广州学界抵制日货[N]. 寰球中国学生会周刊, 1919-10- 20(2).
[7] 日本之对外贸易与排斥日货之影响[N]. 旅欧周刊, 1919-12-27(2).
[8] 斐那市侨胞救亡声[N]. 少年中国晨报, 1915-4-10(4).
[9] 为爱国留学生诸君进一解[N]. 少年中国晨报, 1915-5-9(3).
[10] 夏邦辅. 余之排斥日货观[J]. 留美学生季报, 1919(3): 11-15.
[11] 美国哈佛大学主任发起抵制日货运动[J]. 红色中华, 1932(11): 2.
[12] 韩栋荪. 抵制日货议[J]. 知新, 1926(1): 68-69.
[13] 宁非. 告热心提倡国货抵制日货者[J]. 国货月刊(上海1924), 1925(10): 2-3.
[14] 丁嗣圣. 抵制日货之由来与我国现在之应振兴及应提倡的[J]. 学生文艺丛刊, 1924(8): 46-49.
[15] John Dewey. Shantung as Seen from Within. China Against Japan[J]. The Publicity Bureau of the Chinese Students in the University of Illinois, Champaign: Illinois. Nov. 3, 1919: 56-58.
[16] 杜威. 中国真正之危机[J]. 东方杂志, 1927(13): 40-42.
[17] 辛华. 世界报刊、通讯社、电台译名手册[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1978: 424.
[18] 郑曦原. 共和十年: 《纽约时报》民初观察记[M]. 北京: 当代中国出版社, 2011: 254.
[19] 周昌鸿. 读了十六篇抵制日货的讨论以后[N]. 晨报副刊, 1923-8-5(3).
[20] 余婉卉. “学为世界人”的迷思: 晚清民国文学中的留学生形象[D]. 武汉: 武汉大学, 2010.
[21] 独秀. 学生界应该排斥日货[J]. 新青年, 1920(2): 162-163.
[22] 许纪霖, 宋宏. 现代中国思想的核心观念[M]. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2011: 86.
[23] 陈冷血. 图穷而匕首见[N]. 申报, 1919-5-9(4).
[24] 张冠生. 晴耕雨读[M]. 北京: 新星出版社, 2014: 72.
[25] 王汎森. 启蒙是连续的吗?从晚清到五四[J]. 近代史研究, 2019(5): 5-20.
[26] 室伏高信. 胡适再见记: 中华的动静如何[J]. 独立评论, 1936(213): 5-8.
[27](日)野村浩一. 近代日本的中国认识[M]. 南京: 江苏人民出版社, 2014: 3.
https://doi.org/10.16391/j.CNKI:SUN:LSYJ.0.2010-06-015
[28] 松节. 民族主义的意志[J]. 民众三日刊, 1931(15): 9-11.
引用本文张睦楚. “激情抗议”: “山东问题”下留美中国学生“抵制日货”的价值选择[J]. 中国教育学理论与实践, 2023, 2(1): 62-71.
CitationZHANG Muchu. “Passionate Protest”: The value choice of Chinese students studying in the United States to“Resist Japanese Goods” under the“Shandong Issue”[J]. Theory and Practice of Chinese Pedagogy, 2023, 2(1): 62-71.